Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone watching? Senate Intelligence Committee on WMD...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:56 AM
Original message
Anyone watching? Senate Intelligence Committee on WMD...
I'm on CNN. Rockefeller is on now - at first glance, looks like a pretty strong indictment of * administration's overstating of intelligence analysis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not really...
the repuke majority will keep on protecting the little bu$h kid and his gang of thugs. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. is there another
discussion thread on this? Surely I'm not the only one watching...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is not a strong indictment in the slightest.
Because the content of the report does not include what rockefeller is pointing out. It blames everything on the CIA and specifically says that there was no political pressure brought to bear by the administration on the intelligence.

What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Then Roberts got his wish.
I remember before this investigation started he kept repeating, "We need to look at the CIA." From the beginning he wasn't going to look at the Bush administration. Looks like he accomplished what he set out to do, Blame "Anyone But Bush". I guess that statement can be universal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sigh...
you are right. I guess I actually got up on the still-clinging-to-some-hope-there-are-those-in-government-willing-to-do-the-right-thing side of the bed this morning!

No more CNN for me for a while!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. News vs Facts
>>Because the content of the report does not include what rockefeller is pointing out. It blames everything on the CIA and specifically says that there was no political pressure brought to bear by the administration on the intelligence.<<

Seems the facts disagree with the news once again.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030512fa_fact
SELECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
Donald Rumsfeld has his own special sources. Are they reliable?
They call themselves, self-mockingly, the Cabal—a small cluster of policy advisers and analysts now based in the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans. In the past year, according to former and present Bush Administration officials, their operation, which was conceived by Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, has brought about a crucial change of direction in the American intelligence community.

http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/iraq/1448.html
The Lie Factory

Mother Jones
January 26, 2004
BY ROBERT DREYFUSS & JASON VEST
Mother Jones, January/February 2004
Only weeks after 9/11, the Bush administration set up a secret Pentagon unit to create the case for invading Iraq. Here is the inside story for how they pushed disinformation and bogus intelligence and led the nation to war.

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/leopold11.html
CIA Probe Finds Secret Pentagon Group Manipulated Intelligence on Iraqi Threat
A half-dozen former CIA agents investigating prewar intelligence have found that a secret Pentagon committee, set up by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in October 2001, manipulated reams of intelligence information prepared by the spy agency on the so-called Iraqi threat and then delivered it to top White House officials who used it to win support for a war in Iraq.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html
Special investigation
The spies who pushed for war

Julian Borger reports on the shadow rightwing intelligence network set up in Washington to second-guess the CIA and deliver a justification for toppling Saddam Hussein by force


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Well life is not based on reality, but the perception of reality.
I was not arguing that it was right to blame the CIA, I was only saying that this is exactly what is happening, with the chairman explicitly saying that no political pressure was involved, and it was all the CIAs fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. yes watching
couldn't find any thread. Rockefeller very effective, would like to see a transcript "we would NOT have voted for the IRW" now they are discussing that they disagreed on the definition of "pressure" from admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Roberts said it was the fault of the CIA that we went to war.
It is a white wash of Bush. He says that the CIA gave Bush bad intelligence and Bush acted on that bad intelligence and that there was no political pressure to come up with those results.

Rockefeller says there is disagreement on whether there was pressure to come up with the conclusions that the CIA gave the administration. Also, part of the report dealing with the administration will not be made public until after the election.

It is just a complete whitewash and worthless IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He is an asshole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. If you want, there is a link on the C-Span page for C-Span Org
(Not CSPAN1, CSPAN2, CSPAN3 but CSpan.Org. Lower half part of the page.

http://www.c-span.org/watch/index.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS&ShowVidDays=30&ShowVidDesc=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. It is a whitewash!
So typical that parts of the report will NOT be available until after the election. I am so sick and tired of this ongoing secrecy, this administration makes Nixon and his ilk look like saints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Clear difference between Roberts and Rockfeller.
Roberts says intelligence community failure. Rockfeller says flawed reports due to undue administration pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. So, should we expect the same of the 9/11 Commission?
When the report comes out at the end of the month, will we be informed that all criticism of the administration's handling of pre-9/11 intelligence will be handled in a "Phase 2" post-election report?

This Senate CIA report is completely impotent. Honestly, sometimes I just can't believe this world we're living in.

:grr: :mad: :grr: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Media response not surprising...
Edited on Fri Jul-09-04 10:37 AM by Flubadubya
Directly following the conference the analyst on CNN (sorry, didn't get his name but is a black gentleman who is balding) kept saying over, and over, and over, and over (actually four times as I counted) that the Democrats did NOT - I repeat did NOT oppose the release of the report.

He went on to say that the Dems disagreed with some of it (as Rockefellor purported), but the Dems did NOT oppose the release of the report. Let me reiterate... did NOT oppose the release of the report.

I don't suppose I have to tell you what impression I think this gives to the American public.

MEDIA WHORES GO GET A CLUE!!!! :grr: :mad: :grr: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC