Many serious bugs in ES&S election software are finally being revealed, in spite of ES&S' claims that their software is reliable. The latest bugs to surface, just today, affect the data from optical scan machines as well as from iVotronic paperless voting machines. Bugs revealed so far include:
1) March, 2004. Indiana discovers that ES&S has installed uncertified software on the iVotronics in four counties. The reason? The certified version doesn't tabulate the votes correctly.
http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1706282 2) May, 2004. Miami-Dade, Florida. Memos written nearly a year before show that there are serious bugs in ES&S software, and they are probably present in all ES&S counties. They cause the audit log data to be scrambled and fail to account for ballots cast. This is the version ES&S installed in Indiana — knowing full well about the audit bugs that had not yet been publicized.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1084316008117 For a simple description of how these bugs work, see
http://www.votersunite.org/info/auditbug.asp .
3) July 9, 2004. More and more bugs in the ES&S election management software are revealed in memos written by Miami-Dade election officials to ES&S over a month ago. The central tabulation machines don't have the capacity to handle all the audit data, they have problems when optical scan information is merged, and they can't reliably accept data passed over the phone lines. ES&S response? Fix the problems yourself by changing your procedures.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/9111841.htm If your county uses ES&S voting equipment, make sure the county officials are aware of this information. How many more bugs are exposed in unpublicized memos to ES&S or still hidden in the software? How many bugs are hidden in the other vendors' software?
Paper ballots are clearly more important than ever.
Thanks!!
~ the VotersUnite team