Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The numerous, scary consequences of "The Closing of the American Book"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 09:50 AM
Original message
The numerous, scary consequences of "The Closing of the American Book"
Edited on Sat Jul-10-04 10:22 AM by HuckleB
There's a great editorial piece in the NYTimes this morning by the author of the book "The Noonday Demon: An Atlas of Depression," Andrew Solomon. It discusses this week's report regarding the ongoing downturn in America, focusing on the consequences for this downturn.

The Closing of the American Book
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/10/opinion/10SOLO.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1089468186-K4RsE+yiFa7zDdA6oNjoUg

An excerpt:

"The survey, by the National Endowment for the Arts, also indicates that people who read for pleasure are many times more likely than those who don't to visit museums and attend musical performances, almost three times as likely to perform volunteer and charity work, and almost twice as likely to attend sporting events. Readers, in other words, are active, while nonreaders — more than half the population — have settled into apathy. There is a basic social divide between those for whom life is an accrual of fresh experience and knowledge, and those for whom maturity is a process of mental atrophy. The shift toward the latter category is frightening.

Reading is not an active expression like writing, but it is not a passive experience either. It requires effort, concentration, attention. In exchange, it offers the stimulus to and the fruit of thought and feeling. Kafka said, "A book must be an ice ax to break the seas frozen inside our soul." The metaphoric quality of writing — the fact that so much can be expressed through the rearrangement of 26 shapes on a piece of paper — is as exciting as the idea of a complete genetic code made up of four bases: man's work on a par with nature's. Discerning the patterns of those arrangements is the essence of civilization.

The electronic media, on the other hand, tend to be torpid. Despite the existence of good television, fine writing on the Internet, and video games that test logic, the electronic media by and large invite inert reception. One selects channels, but then the information comes out preprocessed. Most people use television as a means of turning their minds off, not on. Many readers watch television without peril; but for those for whom television replaces reading, the consequences are far-reaching.


----------

Note: Mr. Solomon's suggestion that the possible consequences for a lack of reading may include an increased likelihood of developing depression and Alzheimer's, for those disposed to those disorders, coincides with some of my own questions regarding the sources of increasing levels of mental health diagnoses. I have often wondered if the increase in children diagnosed with true ADHD (we can talk about those given the diagnosis hastily, without a full assessment as another issue) was not partially a result of environmental factors such as this. After all, our current understanding of the brain and its disorders leads us to believe that -- while individuals may be predisposed to certain disorders via genetics -- environment plays a role in how those genetic tendencies play out. For some reason, few professionals even ask this question about ADHD, focusing almost solely on biology.

OK. Blah. Blah. Blah. I could go on, discussing how fewer and fewer Americans seem capable of holding disparate ideas in the hands of their mind, of actually discussing them openly, comparing their actual positives and negatives, rather than repeating what some talking head recently said, usually out of context, without attempting to offer true analysis, but, rather, attempting to sell a philosophy as if it were a product -- turning political, philosophical, religious discussion into a competition of advertisements. The apparent loss in many of our fellow citizens, of all philosophies and creeds, of striving for Pascal's definition of greatness ("A man does not show his greatness by being at one extremity, but rather by touching both at once."), may very well possess, at least partly, an environmental etiology. Or so I say, or at least wonder.

-HuckleB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, skooooo!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Shameless, self-promotional kick.
Hey, I like this piece. It deserves discussion, or so I say.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a great great post HuckleB.
Edited on Sat Jul-10-04 01:12 PM by Hoping4Change
"A book must be an ice ax to break the seas frozen inside our soul."

I love that quote not to mention the entire article.

Richard Hofstadder's Anti-Intellectualism in America addresses the historical reasons Americans shy away from reading, preferring practicality and emotional appeals to intellectual argument. Hofstadder offers amazing insight into this aspect of the American pysche.

There is little value attached to intellectual pursuits even though society is shaped by largely by abstract ideas so the motivation to read is lacking. Most people take the human brain and all it can do for granted, unimpressed about its ability to not only form ideas but also share them with others.



(ps is your avatar a toupee? :))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I like the toupee idea.
I planned to change the thing, but I think I'll have to keep it for a while now.

Hmmmmm.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. But isnt the internet "reading", too?
Most of my online experience is textual, and also in dialogue with othere on this and other boards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "deep reading" vs. more superficial reading...

You don't read pages and pages of text on the internet that continue a long line of complex thought or narrative. There is a big difference in the kind of reading taking place. That doesn't mean "internet reading" is bad or useless, but many people feel you are missing something by not reading longer works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Wally Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The ratio of thoughful posts compared to rants is rather low on the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Here's an
Edited on Sat Jul-10-04 02:25 PM by secondtermdenier
article about the survey.

Not to be too contrary, but I don't feel too guilty about not having read lots of poetry recently (especially because I listen to so much rock and roll }( ). A lot of novels etc. are garbage. The survey has a limited view of "reading for pleasure". Sorry, I'm much more worried about whether people are reading news articles, not "literary works"! Plenty of fools read tons of novels every year, and I imagine many smart people may well be too busy to reread Hamlet or whatever Mr. Solomon would recommend. The survey was too crude for me. I do agree with its unspoken implication that America is full of ignorant clowns, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Literature is extremely valuable to understanding people!

I agree, it may not be for everyone, but certainly for more people than not. To be really literate, you need some understanding of literature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Since when?
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 08:24 AM by Boomer
Up until the early 20th century, novel reading was seen to be frivolous and self-indulgent. Novels were held in low regard compared to histories, biographies, commentaries, even poetry.

So forgive me if I -- who have a house filled with novels -- still view this very narrow definition of literacy with a little suspicion. Novel reading is a trend, a fad, and one that has held ascendancy for a very brief amount of time, mere seconds in the long history of our species' ability to write down our thoughts.

Enshrining the novel reminds of the current attempts to enshrine the institution of marriage. Both have been vested with a significance that is rooted in contemporary mythology rather than historical accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. So you equate the term literature only with novels?
Why would you do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The ability to understand the news is necessary, too.
Edited on Sat Jul-10-04 03:36 PM by HuckleB
Reading goes a long way toward this end. Heck, one can argue quite persuasively that one gets more "truth" out of a historical novel than one does out of a history book about the same era. Literature, from young ages onward can go a long way toward understanding the world. Children who are read to from the word go, who then read themselves, and on and on are much more likely to understand the news that, yes, we should know. But without historical context, without an understanding of human nature, how much good is that news? In fact, one wonders if the news is not dangerous without those things. Does that play a part in our current poltical situation in this country. Does this create people who may be more vulnerable to news like that which comes from Fox, etc...?

No one is saying that folks must read poetry. There is no period in history where poetry was a widely read form, though its study in school goes a long way toward improving one's understanding of language, which gets us back to the need to know the layers of the world in order to understand the news, in order to think the questions that must be asked about the news. This is much of what seems to be lacking, more and more, today.

There's also the issue of passivity brought up by this study. Our habits are hard to break, and once we go passive in one part of life, perhaps its easier to be passive elsewhere. It does seem that the lack of activity in the community by those who don't read may indicate that this is so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC