Beloved Citizen
(522 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:41 PM
Original message |
Newsweek Poll: Kerry 47% Bush 44% Und 6% GOP Buttboy Nader 3% |
|
Without Rotten Ralph in the running Kerry/Edwards leads Bush/Cheney 51% to 45%. This suggests to everyone but the most deluded of Kool-Aid drinkers that Traitor Nader significantly hurts the anti-Bush movement in any state he appears on the ballot. It is no wonder that Nader is receiving aid and comfort from the GOP in anyway they can shovel it to him. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5411094/site/newsweek
|
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Don't hold back. Tell us how you feel about Nader. |
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes Nader is a traitor to his own values unless all he values is his ego |
liveoaktx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. How come when Bush has extra points on Kerry, he's ahead but |
|
when Kerry is LEADING over Bush, it's *tied*. I'm writing to complain about that headline. If it's statistically insignificant over a few points, then they need to stop pumping up Bush's numbers if he's over.
|
Rose Siding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. They are consistent with that, aren't they? |
|
It's either "slight lead" or "statistically tied" but if Bush is ahead, we get something like "Bush Pulls Ahead" or "Kerry fails to gain any traction"
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think Kerry is ahead by more... I wish we had faith in the media.... |
|
but that is earned..and they have been anything but honest and fair
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. The Polling Organizations Are Running Diebold's Software |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. I kinda liked it myself. |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Let's just say that Nader has stoked my antipathy for him lately. |
|
I just have this thing about hypocrites.
|
Beloved Citizen
(522 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. Heaping abuse on Nader |
|
...is all the rage these days.
You might have fallen behind the curve here.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-11-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
Beloved Citizen
(522 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-11-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Or the notion of people facing the consequences of their actions |
|
Blame-free Americans, brought to you by George W Bush and Ralph Nader.
"If it's bad, it must be somebody else's fault."
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-11-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. ""If it's bad, it must be somebody else's fault." |
|
Sounds like some Dems battlecry.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-11-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
24. That's how I feel when you decry racism on one forum |
|
and cheer it on in another.
|
ParisFrance
(340 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Normally I would say he should still run for he has every right to run , but because we are on the verge of a Neo Nazis administration I fail to see how Nader will risk this for his own vanity.
|
Droopy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I don't see how anyone can be undecided about this |
|
Bush has got to be the most polarizing president we've ever had.
|
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Maybe they polled a few comatose people? |
|
Or alzheimer's patients?
That's all I can figure.
|
Droopy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
If not, then the undecided have been living with their heads stuck in the sand the past three years.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
17. GOP Buttboy? I thought Nader was an independent Turd Party candidate. |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Since Nader isn't going to be the Green Nominee, do we have any solid data on how many states there are that he's going to be actually on the ballot? Because if he can't get on the ballot, that 3% or 6% or whatever becomes totally meaningless, obviously. In which case, one wonders why they're bothering to include him in the polling, without including, say, Lyndon LaRouche, or Harry Browne, or Gallagher, or some other fringe person who isn't relevant to the actual numbers of the race.
|
NNadir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-10-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Buttboy? Forkboy? Turd Party Candidate? I love it here. eom |
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-11-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Huh? Shouldn't that be 50%/44%? 51%/45% sounds a bit off... |
|
Seems like the Undecided would be a better group to go after anyway. :shrug:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |