Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunking the Laci Paterson Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 06:48 PM
Original message
Debunking the Laci Paterson Law
"The Bush ad criticizes Kerry for missing two-thirds of the Senate votes while on the campaign trail this year, but going to Washington to vote against the unborn victims bill, also known as Laci and Conner's law."

Is this the one that defined fetuses as people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and I had some right-wing person tell me about this law
He brought it up twice over the course of the evening as why John Kerry was bad. It was kind of annoying actually. You are getting really selective if your main reason for not liking Kerry is the Laci Peterson bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not on its face....
....it states if one perpetrates a crime against a preganant woman, the perpetrator can be charged with perpetrating a crime against the fetus as well. It is feared by many pro choice advocates that this is an attempt to grant the fetus personhood and a first step to ending abortion rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And I would say they are entirely correct to fear that.
That's exactly the intent of the RW in championing this bill. They lucked out and got a 'famous' case to base this on, thus getting more attention and more chance of the bill's passage. Wonder if the media's strong focus on that case was complicit in the strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC