Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we are attacked on 11/01 and Bush cancels, that will prove ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:55 AM
Original message
If we are attacked on 11/01 and Bush cancels, that will prove ...
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 09:15 AM by TruthIsAll
that MIHOPers were right all along. LIHOPers would have to move it up a notch.

Of course others will say he warned us. So * must be God.

Where is our version of the abolitionist John Brown? We need him to speak up now about the current slavery of the masses to the BushCo media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. speak up NOW: "if the elections are cancelled, the terrorists win"

the OUTRAGE must get a lot louder and stronger....

we must STOP NOW any idea or thought or planning of cancelling the elections...and shame those who are doing the planning for the cancellation of the elections....NO FUNDING for their efforts...call/write/email your Congress reps...DEMAND that NO MONEY be spent for planning the cancellation of elections and remind them strongly:

"If elections are cancelled, the terrorists win"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's been a while. . . .
since I took a logic class, but I seem to remember "proofs" being a little more comprehensive in getting from "A to C".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. if they plan on changing the
constitution .then we should by all means move this up....the faster bush is out the better..we don't need to wait until Nov...which by now if the terrorists didn't know we will postpone our democratic elections because of them.....this is playing into their hand...which I doubt is very much the case.

This was brought up for one reason only: FEAR Factor of the masses......

ask the masses if bush is such a great"war resident" and the world is safer.then its a contradiction to say WE FEAR they will attack us in NOV......did he get a e-mail from the terrorists?........the country also would be safer if all our troops and monies were not sent to Iraq....and spent to defend our borders.....
Alot of our first responders were called up for active duty...as with the National Guard....this country "safer" I say "HELL NO"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. that would not prove anything of the sort
it would prove that they cancelled elections. It would be a very suspicious thing but suspicious and proof are two very different things. It might convince you that MIHOP is true but it certainly does not prove it.

We live in a society that values innocent until proven guilty and the burden of proof is something that is very hard to bear and sometimes it is incovenient but it is a very important par tof what makes this country great. It's too bad Ashcroft doesnt think proof is very important and that the conspiracy laws exist because they turn the burden of proof into nothing more than hearsay and supposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, when I'm in court as a juror, I'll remember all that
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 09:39 AM by Eloriel
We live in a society that values innocent until proven guilty...yadayada

In the meantime, I'm a private citizen with, for now at least, a Constitutional right to my own opinions and speech on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What if terrorists struck Nov. 2?
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 09:47 AM by gauguin57
I'm just going to throw this out there ... please don't flame ... it's just a question ...

Regardless of whether it's LIHOP or not ...

What if several major urban centers (and let's say they're Democrat-heavy) were hit by terrorists ON THE MORNING OF NOV. 2? What if the Bank of America Bldg. (or Golden Gate Bridge), the Empire State Building, the Capitol Building, the Sears Tower and some big oil company bldg in Texas were all hit ON THE MORNING OF NOV. 2?

Could there really be a fair election that day? Those major cities themselves could never hold elections with entire cities shut down. Plus, the rest of the country would hole up in their homes as they did on Sept. 11. Remember, they postponed the mayoral election for a short time in New York City, since they were supposed to vote on Sept. 11 and really couldn't.

Now, if the attack took place a week before that, sure, you could get it together to have an election.

What does everyone else think about a Nov. 2 attack scenario? Don't you think a delay of NO MORE THAN A WEEK OR TWO could work in that case? Sickening that we really have to contemplate such a scenario in advance, but, hey. We live in a sick world (and, with the present admin., a sick country).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Want a simple soution that won't fail whether attacked or not?
For this election and subsequent elections,use absentee ballots.
You don't have to leave home to go vote, you can vote prior to 11-02, and you know it will be hand-counted.

Of course bush doesn''t suggest this, his only recourse (again supports my arguements that people revert to what they are geared to do when stressed) is to cancel the election. like when the Supreme Court stopped the florida count when bush saw he was losing.

Bush stopped the vote in the UN for the war resopution because he only had three of 15 nations on the security council who would vote for war.

When Bush lost the medicare vote; Republicans kept the vote going for over 3 hours threatening and bribing congressmen to change their votes.

so, of course they want to postphone (stop the vote) an election, Bush is knee-deep in shit and his kneejerk reaction is consistent with past practices.
they do not care for Democracy and their INTENTIONS prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC