Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN New Poll Numbers Here: Kerry 50, Bush 46

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:31 PM
Original message
CNN New Poll Numbers Here: Kerry 50, Bush 46
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 02:53 PM by VolcanoJen
Just reported on "Inside Politics." No link yet; I copied the numbers from the TV screen, thanks to Tivo. :D

CNN/USAToday/Gallup Poll

July 8-11 Sampling error +/- 3.5% pts

Kerry 50%
Bush 46%

Likely Voters Choice Before and After Edwards Pick

BEFORE
Kerry 47%
Bush 47%

AFTER
Kerry 50%
Bush 46%

Bill Schneider also reports that Kerry/Edwards are now leading in four major polls, which to him is proof that at least some bounce has occurred.

Kerry/Edwards Bounce, Broken Down Into Categories:

Gender

Men +1
Women +4

Then, the Generation Gap... I think this is HUGE:

Under 50 +10
50 and Older -5

Geographical:

South 0
Non-South +4

Look at this Rural bounce, though:

Urban +7
Suburban -4
Rural +13

Political Ideology

Conservatives 0
Moderates +5
Liberals +6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Enough to win...
... not enough to keep repukes from cheating AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luaneryder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. That's the rub isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah baby!
I pretty much try to ignore the polls, but hey, it's still nice.

Picking Edwards was a smart move by Kerry.

Loved Edwards on 6O minutes, and frankly, was most impressed with the "little women." Teresa tells it like is and Elizabeth is smart as a whip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. How did Judy Woodslut take the news...
Has she downed the strychnine yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
This confirms that the Ipsod/reid poll was an extreme outlier. But then again this same poll was way way way off on there predictions for the Canadien races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. How far were they off in the Canadian election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. way off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nice, Now is the Time To Really Kick it Up a Notch!
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 02:37 PM by Beetwasher
and kick Smirky/Snarly in the balls!

We've hit the 50% mark people and we're outside MOE! That's HUGE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Also hit 50 in another poll
I believe it was newsweek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. NOT outside MOE. Kerry needs a 7 point lead (2*3.5)
MOE = 3.5

Kerry 50 means Kerry can be as high as 53.5, as low as 46.5
Bush 46 means Bush can be as high as 49, as low as 43.

Kerry needs a 7 point led to be outside MOE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. This would be considere outside MOE
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 03:38 PM by Beetwasher
He's up by 4 and MOE is 3.5. That's outside MOE...I understand what you're saying regarding the highs and lows, however, this is technically outside of MOE with these types of polls...I think (could be wrong!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Correction to my last post. This is the definition of MOE.
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 05:33 PM by TruthIsAll
The MOE is the total range on either side of the poll in which we can expect the actual results to fall for a given probability (usually 95%).

For instance, we have Kerry ahead by 50-46, with a 3.5% MOE on each side of the poll.

Thus, if the election were held today, there is a 95% probability that Kerry would receive between 46.5% and 53.5% of the vote.

There is a 2.5% probability he would get higher than 53.5%.
There is a 2.5% probability he would get lower than 46.5%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. More than 3.5% undecideds here
and that clinches it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry needs to go to *at least* 54%
to be in a comfortable enough lead in order to counter the GOP cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Awww. How did Judy and Candy take it?
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 02:39 PM by Kahuna
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. hee hee
:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. No word from "I Love Candy" Crowley, but Judy wasn't happy.
She said, "All right!" and moved right into a story about the Latino vote in Arizona.

By the way, we're seriously making gains in Arizona... it's absolutley up for grabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I am making sure of that!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. BTW, Are these CNN/Gallup Numbers?
If so, this is even bigger given their constant Bush slant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, CNN/USAToday/Gallup.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Ahh! Saw After You Edited! This is Actually INCREDIBLE!
Gallup is a complete whore outfit with no credibility. If they are publicizing these numbers, I'm fairly certain they are MUCH worse for the admin. Their polls are only reliable in that you can rely on them to whore unabashedly and slant them as much as possible for the admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. And "undecideds" historically break 60-80% for the new guy, not incumbent.
I learned that from DU'er TruthIsAll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frangible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. (in a Hugo Weaving voice)
"Tell me, Mr. Anderson... what good are poll ratings... if there is no election?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Repugs See the Polls...
...and they're raising us one delayed (or cancelled) election, in order manipulate things so that bu$hit 'wins'. ¿

...or they may trot binLaden out of Pakistan/Afghanistan sometime in October - or both.

...the weasels are NOT going to sit there and let Kerry win fair and square - they're going to pull every trick in and out of Hitler's book to prevent it - margins of error or none.

...if they can't CHEAT again to get him reselected, they've gone to plan B (and C)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. this is why the election must be postponed
!! Bush could lose !!

oh my gawd terrorist attact !!

run hide stop voting - give up your rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I fear that you are right. The GOP must not be allowed to get away withit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. I saw Kerry 50%, Bush 45%, Nader 2% on CNN when Nader included!
Nader is sinking like a rock according to the chart they showed and Bush dropped 1 pt with Nader included, Kerry stayed at 50%!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hooray! Kick, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC