Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay Marriage Amendment Battle Now Focuses On House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:32 PM
Original message
Gay Marriage Amendment Battle Now Focuses On House
(Washington) With the Senate set to deliver George W. Bush a serious defeat and potential embarrassment over the Federal Marriage Amendment the Republican in the House say they are continuing to move ahead on the issue that would insert a ban on gay marriage in the Constitution.

GOP Supporters of the proposed amendment are setting their eyes on a vote just prior to the November election.

In the meantime, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) is pushing two pieces of legislation that would strengthen the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

One bill would prevent the Supreme Court from hearing challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act. The other would stop the District of Columbia from recognizing gay marriages performed in other states.

Continued:
http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/07/071304houseMarr.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um, can they do that?
I mean, prevent the supreme court from hearing ANY case at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monobrau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Boneheads
What's idiotic about these cretin's behavior is that attempting to weaken the balance of power between the branches of government makes them more vulnerable when the inevitable shift comes and they find themselves in the minority, which is likely to happen within the next 2-3 years if they keep this nonsense up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why should they bring this debate to the House...
...if they lost it in Senate?

I mean, to have a Constitutional Amendment passed, one needs 2/3 votes in BOTH the house and senate. If they lose in senate, isn't the amendment dead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC