Letter I sent to Bill O'Reilly

[Tony_FLADEM]

Tonight you asked the question -- why is George W. Bush so hated.


In all honesty, people don't hate George W. Bush -- instead people hate you. Every night you exhibit endless hypocrisy and contemptuous dishonesty all in the pursuit of making money and being in power. You seem to believe you are an asset for your president - but in all reality you are a liability causing people to hate your president and motivating people to be against everything you claim to espouse.

You have also asked why people don't go on your show. Let me explain it to you in a way that is the most compassionate --it's obvious you were abused as a child in the way you conduct yourself and some people are not used to your bombastic behavior so they don't go on your show.

[Brian Morans]

1. I can hear the sound of veins popping from here.

[olddem43]

2. Good one! - do you think he will read it on the air?

[jeff30997]

3. Response from Bill O'Reilly:

Shut up!Shut uuuuup!:evilgrin:

[AlFrankenFan]

4. lol that's what I was gonna say

"That is vicious with a capital V!!!"

[azmesa207]

7. Response from Bill O Reilly

He wont even see it they will not let it even get to your Highness asshole O Reilly he would shit his pants and fire every one that let it get to him

[Justitia]

5. OMG! I LOVE it!

Have a donut, you deserve it!
:donut:

[Jerseygirltoo]

6. Prediction

O'Reilly will be calling for a boycott of the Philippines

[JohnnyRingo]

8. Shoulda kept it more "pithy"

...Hahahaaa
How 'bout like this: "Hey Bill...GFY !"

Kidding aside, O'Reilly is one of the most dangerous of propagandists. He spins facts to suit his means in such a way that his fans hear it as "simple common sense".

That's why he uses the "I'm watching out for your interests" theme.

[SemperEadem]

9. It's the perfect qualifier he can use

"That's why he uses the "I'm watching out for your interests" theme"

To borrow the currently used line in the movie "Anchorman": He's watching out for your interests so you don't have to yourself... you can keep abandoning the responsibility to yourself to find out for yourself the facts from many sources to better ascertain if what is being relayed to you is the truth. If he huffs and puffs and breaks out in splotchy marks all over his face enough, then you know he *must* be telling the truth while he's watching out for grown folk's interests.

[Zen]

10. Some emails I wrote to O'Reilly...

"Hi Bill,

I saw your little "truth police" segment where you picked around the edges of the F-911 movie. Too bad you kinda missed the point of the "big picture" (as you always do) where Moore exposes Bush for the lying criminal that he is. You and your lover Bush can burn in hell for all I care - you and satan are good friends anyway."

"Bill@ Fox News...

I can't actually refer to you as a news channel because that would imply a fair and balanced look at issues reported there. It is a typical right wing ploy to say the actual opposite of what is really happening and see how many people you can trick. It's been working for some time - even after several Republican folks have joked about the Big Lie of Fox news, there are so many "fans" of Fox "news" that cannot apparently see the nose in front of their face. The fact that there are folks at work who are "fans" (they have Fox "news" paraphernalia in their office) is bizarre. In fact, on the front page of the web site it says "become a Fox fan" and there is also a link to a "Fox News shop". Is this someone's idea of a cruel joke? News shows don't have "fans"!! How can you be balanced if you have a following?? Don't you realize that you cannot have fans unless you are reporting issues in such a way that makes a certain group happy? When these so-called "fans" talk at work of a story reported on Fox they are met with "yeah, that's unbiased news - ha!" and they have to tuck their tail between their legs because nobody can defend Fox as reporting actual "News".

Can't you see the paradox of what you have created? It is tantamount to creating a "government controlled" media outlet. There is no room for descent. Why else would Fox try to sue Al Franken and even, unbelievably, Fox entertainment because they see Fox "news" for what it is - a diatribe of biased trash.

"Heil Fox "news""!!!"