Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think this election-delay trial balloon was a set-up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:01 AM
Original message
I think this election-delay trial balloon was a set-up
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:10 AM by troublemaker
Because it's rightly assumed that Bush will try to steal the election if he can, the election delay inquiry leak has succeeded in getting everyone one on record making statements of resolve that elections must be held on time no matter what.

I don't think any Democrats could have handled this differently, so I'm not criticizing. (The best political moves involve putting your opponent in a lose-lose situation.) But I do think it's set-up.

I can think of no scenario involving a terrorist attack in the US between Halloween and the polls closing on November 2nd that favors Kerry. So here's the equation in front of Karl Rove: Terror strike = big short term Bush gain that rapidly decays over the hours and days. The right play is to make damn sure that if you do happen to hit the terror lottery nobody will be able to mess up your windfall by calling for a delay in the election. Delay means time to think, and a thinking electorate is not Rove's friend.

I personally think this is merely a low-cost piece of political insurance for the WH, but my reasoning is even more applicable in MIHOP scenarios. If you timed an incident for what you consider maximum advantage, wouldn't you want to guarantee that nothing fucked up the timing?

The best outcome of all of this is it might enable us to encourage Democratic absentee voting even more. Don't take a chance! If there is any disruption in the election turn-out will drop and all absentee ballots will count disproportionately. (The election terror meme itself is a raw turn-out inhibitor. They can't win without low turn-out.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. the BEST response would be
to say, "holding a safe, secure, and peaceful election is one of the foremost responsibilities of any government. if the president cannot assure america that we will have free and safe elections on the first tuesday in november, just as we have had every four years throughout our entire history, then the president has failed his office and he has failed his people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That needs to be our slogan.
If * has made us so safe, why are they even thinking about postponing the elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I just heard Thom Hartmann interview Larry Klayman of Judicial
Watch (I know, I know who he is, Cato Inst. etc.). He was talking about loose, suitcase sized nukes taking out significant centers of population. Whether this is ultra-tinfoil-hat, or a set-up as you mentioned, it is nonetheless being floated on RadioPower.org. I heard it. Don't believe me and go look it up...

Bush is losing control and sinking in the polls. Moore's movie is starting to have an impact on the general, non-political populace. So many scandals exposed... Bush&Co are already showing signs of desperation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They definitely want to scare people, and
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:23 AM by troublemaker
if our populations were distributed evenly I'd love it, since Bush voters that believe all this crap would be the one's scared away from the polls.

Unfortunately Democratic voters are concentrated in dense areas where high-security measures will be most disruptive and where fears of terror are most legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. A matter of perception..
IF there is a terror attack on our soil before the election, our perception should be that it is BECAUSE of this current misadministration.
The world has become a much more dangerous place due to the failed policies of boosh and the rest of his puppeteers.

Oh, and I have applied for my absentee ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It should be, but if what voters *should* think was the issue
then the Kerry would get 100% and none of this would matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. swing state, blue state terror
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:46 AM by Snazzy
Some damn thing with a disproportinate gain. Hadn't thought of that. Still have elections, but Ohio, or Florida, or fucking California doesn't vote normally.

Not sure what the legal implications are, but you clearly don't want to leave to the Supremes. WTF happens if California doesn't report, ala Arnold? Can they be discounted w/o Congress?

Man, been staying away from this meme/spin/rw bs, but think you are on to something.

Scary.

(Edit: Clarify: I say 'fucking California' with kindness in my heart. I mean it is so damn significant. Will scope some of our rules to see wtf re: states reporting)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC