Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FMA is dead!!! 48-50

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:48 AM
Original message
FMA is dead!!! 48-50
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM by Bleachers7
C-span "The Senate has voted 48-50 against continuing debate." 60 votes needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. lol
Stupid republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Especially Santorum
what a pathetic excuse of a human...begging on the floor of the senate. Has he no dignity? I hope this exposes those republicans as the boobs that they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. It certainly does
What an unbelievably idiotic ploy.

Thanks, Frothy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
44. He begged??!!
What did he say? No he has no dignity...no integrity either.

Glad this died. It needed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am assuming we have moderate Repubs to thank
no doubt Zell voted FOR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Cloture votes can be ambiguous
You might vote for cloture even if you opposed the bill if you figured it would be defeated or if you wanted somebody to actually take a stand.
You might vote for cloture if you favored the bill and wanted to force a vote either to pass it or to get somebody else on the record.
You might vote against cloture, if you were opposed to the bill but were afraid it might pass.
You might vote against cloture if you favored the bill, but needed more time to round up the votes you needed to pass it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Where could I find a tally of the votes? Just for curiousity sake.
Thanks.
Terry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOteric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. Here, (link provided) but it's not up yet.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_108_2.htm

The site will provide the entire roll call yeas and nays as soon as the information is avialable (takes a little time). It's S.J. Res. 40 that you're looking for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Thank you. Much appreciated. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. List is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who voted?
Do we have a break down of the votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. This is it, I think
Democrats voting yes: Miller (GA), Nelson (NE), Byrd (WV)
Republicans voting no: Campbell (CO), McCain (AZ), Collins (ME), Chafee (RI), Sununu (NH), Snowe (ME)

This was a cloture vote so some will be able to say it was a procedural vote and claim they support both sides.

Kerry and Edwards were absent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Sad that Byrd voted for this...given his passion for the Constitution.
But not unexpected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. This was just for cloture
His vote is for wanting to have everyone just shut up and take a stand already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. No, that isn't it
This was a motion to proceed. This would have opened up the bill to amendments and would have made there be weeks of amendments and debate instead of voting on the real issues in the country. It is just that Byry is against gay rights most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Ah you're right
so Byrd was against wanting to expose himself to those who have shown him favor for his stand against the war. lol... politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Byrd?!?
Goddamn it.

Looks like he hasn't shed himself of ALL of his past bigotry. Oh well. I knew it wasn't gonna pass anyway. It was always meant to be a tool of the right to pander to the hateful douchebags in the voter rolls. Nothing else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. Didn't you ever read his speech about DOMA
very sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. Yeah. I read it.
Call me an optimist, but I had hopes that he wanted to shitcan this proposed amendment. Meh. You can't have everything I guess....

On another note, I wonder what it would take for Snowe and Chaffee to "pull a Jeffords". That would be sweeeeeet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. who voted for it/against it??
Link or list would be grand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
56. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. The people have spoken.
Closer than it should have been, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well that's why they pulled this stunt in an election year
to try to scare congress into voting with the wind.

Unfortunately for stupid republicans, swing voters skew away from support for a ban, not for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. I was just going to say that.
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM by skypilot
I'm glad, of course, that it was defeated but 48-50 is still too close for comfort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
48. That isn't really all that close.
If you figure we had 2 more no votes if we needed them (Kerry and Edwards would have come if we needed). And they need 2/3rds to pass the Amendment.

I agree it is more bigots in the Senate than we want, but they can't call that any kind of victory. They wanted to get half at least and failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AFSCME girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. That's true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is This The Vote
To determine whether or not they could vote on it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. lol
Cloture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. C-span 2 says
"The Senate has voted 48-50 against continuing debate. 60 votes were needed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. C-Span 2 says 48-50.
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM by displacedtexan
60 votes were needed.

Edited: this was just the vote against continuing the debate.

Now repukes have to decide whether or not to bring it to the floor for an up or down vote, which is what the dems want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. 60 were required for cloture
that was a cloture vote, if I'm not mistaken.

67 votes were required for the measure to pass since it is an amendment to the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. The senate woman said 47 at first.
Then she asked if anyone didn't vote. I think someone was hedging their bets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. I would think the Dems would want cloture as well
but it appears they chickened out of having to vote against the ban.

For shame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. There are two types of cloture, if I undestand correctly
The first is when there is a motion to proceed which, if passed, allows the Senate to bring the issue to the floor and begin debating amendments and eventually final passage.

The second is to cut off debate and move to a final vote on the issue.

This one was the first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Yeah I figured that after I read your post above
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:10 PM by redqueen
Wish it was the second... I'd have loved to see the Repubs vote against voting on their pet issue.

:evilgrin:

oops, on edit: thanks for the lesson! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. I wish there had been a final vote
It would have been nice to actually see how they would vote. There were a lot of republicans who said they might vote no, but now can get out of it by saying they supported cloture vote. Apparently, some republicans were saying that this was a party loyalty vote and that all republicans should vote yes, even if they oppose the amendment. So, that may be why some republicans like Chuck Hagel voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AFSCME girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Rock on!!
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
22. They couldn't even get 50% - HAH!!
Fools!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. Robert Byrd voted to continue debate?
The guy who carries around a little copy of the constitution in his pocket?

What, did he have a post-it note on the back to write in a ban of same-sex marriages?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. He was probably enjoying seeing the pukes squirm
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. he's as big a homophobe as the Republicans
I remember listening to him while he was clutching the bible on the senate floor railing against gays during the Senate Defense of Marriage Act debate in the 90's. Thats why i cringe whenever i see DUers praising that bigotted asshole just because he gives a good anti war speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xyboymil Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wow..they fell WAY short
Not even a majority wanted this. Didnt they need like 60 or more votes?? :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Yep
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
30. Excellent news
I can't believe they even wasted their time with this. It was dead on arrival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
34. I hope this chips away at Ricky's power.
Santorum can go home and play with his doggies now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. May I paraphrase Natalie Maines?
I just wanted you to know that I am ashamed that Rick Santorum is from Pennsylvania. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
61. Or his turtles?
Frothily?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcooksey Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
35. So, now what?
They voted against continuing debate. So does that mean they either have to table it, or have a vote on the amendment as written (no modifications allowed)?

I'm watching C-SPAN 2 online, and they're all milling around aimlessly. I suspect they're taking a break for lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I think so
They do usually leave around now on Wednesdays for their weekly party conferences. I think that the amendment will just go away for a while and they now move to consideration of the Australia free trade bill.

However, if the the Republicans agree to a vote on final passage on this text, then Democrats would let there be a final vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. Woooo hOOOOOOOOO!!!
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:09 PM by dnvechoes
Does that kill it for the year? Prolly so.

The Press better cover this as

"A crushing defeat for the Bush Administration."

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
45. Kerry and Edwards were BOTH there for the vote?
I'm glad to hear it, but it seems odd inasmuch as there's campaigning going on.

Good work boys!

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. No, I think they were absent
98 senators voted and I'm pretty confident those were the two names that weren't called.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Doh! I forgot how to add!
Somehow seeing 48 and 50 made me think it was 100. Damn, I'm stupid.

Skimming this CNN article leads me to believe they were indeed absent:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/14/samesex.marriage/index.html

Oh well, I'm sure they would have been there for a real vote. It's wonderful to see this fail.

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. I heard on the national news that THEY WOULD BE THERE to vote against it
If that's the case and they ditched to go touch each other in front of some more cameras... I'll still vote Kerry only because * is a bigger danger to the little remaining stability of this country, but what the hell gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
47. This is priceless!
They not only have egg on their faces, they've got the whole chicken farm! Way to vote, Senators!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscaster Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
51. Here is the list of bill sponsors.
Sen Brownback, Sam - 7/7/2004 Sen Cochran, Thad - 7/7/2004
Sen Craig, Larry E. - 7/8/2004 Sen Crapo, Michael D. - 7/8/2004
Sen Dole, Elizabeth H. - 7/13/2004 Sen Enzi, Michael B. - 7/7/2004
Sen Fitzgerald, Peter - 7/7/2004 Sen Frist, Bill - 7/7/2004
Sen Hatch, Orrin G. - 7/7/2004 Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey - 7/7/2004
Sen Inhofe, Jim - 7/7/2004 Sen Kyl, Jon - 7/7/2004
Sen Lott, Trent - 7/7/2004 Sen McConnell, Mitch - 7/7/2004
Sen Miller, Zell - 7/7/2004 Sen Santorum, Rick - 7/7/2004
Sen Sessions, Jeff - 7/7/2004 Sen Shelby, Richard C. - 7/7/2004
Sen Talent, Jim - 7/7/2004

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. OMG! Hutchison?
She's gonna catch hell! A lot of her supporters are moderate suburbanite TXans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. Fuck Idaho. That's all I have to say. :(
I hate my representatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
62. KAY BAILEY HUTCHINSON
CAN EAT MY SHORTS!!!!

I am a Texan and I HATE her with all the fiery passion of hell. Which is where I wish she'd go.

Damn bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
54. Got a roll call on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
60. Only for this year... they'll waste more time and money until they do
get it passed.

You'd think work worth doing would be dealt with instead of this nonsense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC