Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WMD sham - right from the horse's mouth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:02 PM
Original message
WMD sham - right from the horse's mouth
or horse's ass (wolfowitz).

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/053103A.shtml

WMD Just a Convenient Excuse for War, Admits Wolfowitz
By David Usborne
Independent Digital

Friday 30 May 2003

The Bush administration focused on alleged weapons of mass destruction as the primary justification for toppling Saddam Hussein by force because it was politically convenient, a top-level official at the Pentagon has acknowledged.

...

The extraordinary admission comes in an interview with Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Defence Secretary, in the July issue of the magazine Vanity Fair.

"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on," Mr Wolfowitz tells the magazine.
The comments suggest that, even for the US administration, the logic that was presented for going to war may have been an empty shell. They come to light, moreover, just two days after Mr Wolfowitz's immediate boss, Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, conceded for the first time that the arms might never be found.



i know most of you know this already but it needs more exposure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are WMDs. There are not WMDs. Sounds like flip-flopping to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. There MUST be a pony. Under all that horse shit, there MUST be a pony.
Nah - just horse shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, I don't know why pundits don't mention this more often, esp. Kerry's
representatives who speak for him on the news programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I never read that entire article but...
...I did read that excerpt. I would have sworn that that admission would have been all over the news. It's amazing the way members of this administration can just tell people right to their faces that they've been duped and they still don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC