Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby Poll: Kerry back in Electorial Vote Lead....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
xyboymil Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:03 PM
Original message
Zogby Poll: Kerry back in Electorial Vote Lead....
Kerry Gains Momentum in the Battleground States - New Zogby Interactive Presidential Battleground Poll Reveals



Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry did some good for his campaign by choosing John Edwards, a U.S. senator from North Carolina, as his running mate, the latest edition of the Zogby Interactive collection of polls in battleground states shows.

Mr. Kerry has regained an advantage in the Electoral College race for the White House in the latest round of simultaneous polling in 16 key states in the 2004 Presidential election, which began as Mr. Kerry was announcing his selection during a rally in Pittsburgh.


A close call yet...but based on the numbers, Kerry now would lead 322-205 over Bush.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=842




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. VERY telling that, yesterday, when they were parsing poll numbers on CNN,
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:14 PM by calimary
(or maybe it was the day before),
Bill "American Enterprise Institute" Schneider spent most of his time talking about how Edwards hadn't made a dent in Kerry's ratings in Edwards' own home state. Well, okay, maybe there are still too many knuckledraggers there. And the anchor (I forget who) kept trying to steer him back to the overalls that showed Edwards HAD INDEED made a difference. He kept wanting to focus on the single state effect. They'll say ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kholst Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't buy Zogby's technique...
But his results aren't far from rasmussenreports.com

First, Zogby counts leads that aren't statistically significant as wins in this tally.

Second, and more importantly, his sample is biased. The sample is only those people who visitted his web site, signed up to receive emails from him, and responded to an email asking for participants. I have trouble believing that this makes for an accurate cross-section of the country.

As I said, though, Rasmussen has Kerry with a lead in the electoral college as well. I'm still lookign into their techniques.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Good catch on the polling techniques ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ehhhh, Wrong!!! Thanks for playing.
"In our national telephone surveys, the gap in the south closed from Bush 53% to Kerry 35% in early June. But now it is Bush 50% to Kerry 40%. If these numbers hold in the south, the President's game play will be thrown off as they will at least have to spend more time and resources in the previously thought safe region."

Bwahahahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kholst Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. ummm... that's not the poll we're talking about...
Zogby does traditional (telephone) polling as well, but his electoral college state-by-state polls are based on what he calls "interactive polls"

right on the page linked to in the title post:
"Zogby Interactive respondents were invited to participate from panels of likely voters who have agreed to take part in online surveys. Respondents followed instructions leading them to the survey located on secure servers at Zogby Interactive headquarters in Utica, New York. All surveys were completed between Tuesday, July 6 through Saturday, July 10. Slight weights were applied to region, party, age, race, religion, and gender to more accurately reflect the votingpopulation in the United States."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes I was one of them.
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 09:26 AM by Reciprocity
All surveys were completed between Tuesday, July 6 through Saturday, July 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Zogby's interactive poll numbers
are usually pretty close to the telephone call numbers. Zogby is pioneering the online technique and takes into consideration the inherent problems with the interactive method. He appears to be refining it as he goes and its starting to look pretty accurate.

Again, don't forget Zogby was the only one that called '00 for Gore with his polls so he definitely knows what he's doing and how to remove any inherent biases. Its not perfect but its getting there. With the proliferation of cell phones and averseness to solicitiation calls at home, interactive is the way of the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kholst Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't question Zogby's skills
I think he's probably doing interactive polling better than anyone and will get better at it still, but there are too many filters and the technique is too new not to treat the results with a heavy dose of skepticism. You take the overall population, crop it to only those with internet, further crop it to only those who visit a specific polling site, further crop it to only those who sign up, further crop it to those that Zogby invited to participate, and finally crop it to those who respond to the invitation... Except for the second to last, I have no doubt that each step skews the sample from the general population. I know Zogby adjusts the results based on demographics, but the more adjustment that needs to be made, the wider the margin of error introduced.

His results are interesting and maybe useful (especially considering how few traditional polls even attempt a state-by-state poll), but should be viewed with the awareness that the technique is far from perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Damn! TN is tied???
That's awesome. The trend is clear. Kerry is strengthening his position in the battleground states that leaned Kerry and opening up new one's that weren't battlegrounds before, like TN and VA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xyboymil Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Agreed...
The biggest nightmare for GW Bush is that he loses ground in the south and has to spend campaign money/time to get states he thought were his.

If that happens, he will lose the Midwest. YES!! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not good enough. We have to get bush under 200 EV's.
dig in folks, we want this to be a clear message to bush and his Junta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. There would have been one more Florida respondent if
Yahoo hadn't put my invitation from Zogby to participate in that particular poll in my SPAM file. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC