Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No difference my ass

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 10:42 PM
Original message
No difference my ass
Over and over again we hear the cry of no difference between the parties. Today we had a great example of what a lie that is.

Here is the rollcall on the anti same sex marriage amendment.


On this vote, a "yes" vote was a vote to advance the measure and a "no" vote was a vote to stop it.


Voting "yes" were 3 Democrats and 45 Republicans.


Voting "no" were 43 Democrats, 6 Republicans and 1 Independent.


X denotes those not voting.


Democrats Yes


Byrd, W.Va.; Miller, Ga.; Nelson, Neb.


Democrats No


Akaka, Hawaii; Baucus, Mont.; Bayh, Ind.; Biden, Del.; Bingaman, N.M.; Boxer, Calif.; Breaux, La.; Cantwell, Wash.; Carper, Del.; Clinton, N.Y.; Conrad, N.D.; Corzine, N.J.; Daschle, S.D.; Dayton, Minn.; Dodd, Conn.; Dorgan, N.D.; Durbin, Ill.; Feingold, Wis.; Feinstein, Calif.; Graham, Fla.; Harkin, Iowa; Hollings, S.C.; Inouye, Hawaii; Johnson, S.D.; Kennedy, Mass.; Kohl, Wis.; Landrieu, La.; Lautenberg, N.J.; Leahy, Vt.; Levin, Mich.; Lieberman, Conn.; Lincoln, Ark.; Mikulski, Md.; Murray, Wash.; Nelson, Fla.; Pryor, Ark.; Reed, R.I.; Reid, Nev.; Rockefeller, W.Va.; Sarbanes, Md.; Schumer, N.Y.; Stabenow, Mich.; Wyden, Ore.


Democrats Not Voting


Edwards, N.C.; Kerry, Mass.


Republicans Yes


Alexander, Tenn.; Allard, Colo.; Allen, Va.; Bennett, Utah; Bond, Mo.; Brownback, Kan.; Bunning, Ky.; Burns, Mont.; Chambliss, Ga.; Cochran, Miss.; Coleman, Minn.; Cornyn, Texas; Craig, Idaho; Crapo, Idaho; DeWine, Ohio; Dole, N.C.; Domenici, N.M.; Ensign, Nev.; Enzi, Wyo.; Fitzgerald, Ill.; Frist, Tenn.; Graham, S.C.; Grassley, Iowa; Gregg, N.H.; Hagel, Neb.; Hatch, Utah; Hutchison, Texas; Inhofe, Okla.; Kyl, Ariz.; Lott, Miss.; Lugar, Ind.; McConnell, Ky.; Murkowski, Alaska; Nickles, Okla.; Roberts, Kan.; Santorum, Pa.; Sessions, Ala.; Shelby, Ala.; Smith, Ore.; Specter, Pa.; Stevens, Alaska; Talent, Mo.; Thomas, Wyo.; Voinovich, Ohio; Warner, Va.


Republicans No


Campbell, Colo.; Chafee, R.I.; Collins, Maine; McCain, Ariz.; Snowe, Maine; Sununu, N.H.


Others No


Jeffords, Vt.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&ncid=703&e=8&u=/ap/20040714/ap_on_go_co/gay_marriage_rollvote

The Democrats split 43 no, 3 yes, and 2 not voting. The non voters were campaigning for President. The Republicans split 6 no, 45 yes, and no non voters. For those who like percentages. 86 percent of the no votes and slightly over 6% of the yes votes. The Republicans provided 12% of the no votes and just under 94% of the yes votes.

It gets even more stark when you look at our three yes votes. Zell Miller is speaking at the Republican convention and won't be in the Senate in 2005, Byrd is in his 80s and is a bit of a relic on social issues he may well not run again, which leaves Nelson of Nebraska as the only Democrat of recent vintage who voted for this awful amendment.

Looking at the six Republican no votes yields some of the same dynamic. Campbell of Colorado is retiring. McCain of Arizona may be in his last term (skin cancer), Collins, Snowe, and Chaffee are liberal relics who don't come close to representing their party. That leaves Sununu, who represents New Hampshire with a gay rights law, as the only Conservative Republican who voted against and is likely to be in the Senate for future terms.

By any standard this is a huge difference on close to a party line vote. No difference my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. if Bob Kerrey was still in the senate he would have voted no
bob kerrey was 100 percent for gay rights and he was from the conservative state of nebraska . yet he was still popular. i wish he never left. he was also totally for abortion rights. ben nelson isn't really popular enough to go against his state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very Interesting. Got the votes for the "Patriot Act."
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 10:57 PM by DemsUnite
How about anything and everything that can be morphed into a national security issue, or defense spending intiative.

Gay rights/marriage is a political smokescreen ...

(on edit: typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Google is your friend
Though I will give you the Patriot act numbers in the Senate but you will have to do your homework for the rest. Feingold voted against the rest of the Senate voted for. But I do appreciate the fact you consider my rights a smokescreen. I guess it is better than gonadal politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YIMA Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish Kerry and Edwards would have voted.
This was a chance for them to go on record taking a strong stand against this hate-driven legislation in a way that would show their undenable support for the Gay and Lesbian community, shoving it right in the face of * and his fascist followers. I really believe this would have been worth returning to Washinton D.C. for and would have sent an undeniable signal that they will not be intimidated by * who wants to play political football with people's lives.

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That would require them to take a stand.
Can't have that. Especially when you are trying to woo the center/right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YIMA Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm so PO'd!!
What's with people who can't take a stand? Damnit, we're talking about people's lives!!! Show up and cast your vote. Trying to cater to everyone only makes people wonder if you have a backbone at all.

:grr: :nuke: :grr: :nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They did the right thing here
The Democrats whole arguement was that this was not an issue to take time with now and besides the lack of a vote is equivalent of a no vote. They needed 60 yes votes not 60% of those voting. If they had returned for this then they would have had to return for pretty much every vote between now and election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. if they had returned and voted, they would have made this an issue
in the campaign. No vote, means no issue. It is pretty simple. Now weedboy and f'u cannot beat them over the head about this. They can't run ads about it.

It will be a non-issue for the election - which is should be. It is not a federal matter, but the individual states place to pass the laws regulating domestic relations. And definitely it is not the place of the feds to adopt an amendment to the Constitution on this.

Wars, health care, economy, those are the issues.

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm the fact.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC