Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If I were a Republican I would be very depressed after watching Wolf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 11:59 AM
Original message
If I were a Republican I would be very depressed after watching Wolf
They went through five swing states recent polls -PA,OH,MI,FL and NC and Kerry was leading in all except NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That NC is listed as a swing state now
Should be depressing enough! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. And NC was close!
Kerry has a sizeable lead if fucking Nader wasn't involved.

Just who are the dumbass 5% who would vote for him after knowing what they know about his contributions? Are there republicans sandbagging the polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Literate Tar Heel Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. if you're talking about the N.C. poll
Nader isn't even involved, I don't think he'll be on the ballot here, he wasn't in 2000 ... it was Bush 48, Kerry 45, undecided 7, with a 3% margin of error ... my feeling is that most of the 7% undecided are people who voted for Bush in 2000 but are unhappy enough with him now to not be committed yet and are waiting to hear more from and learn more about Kerry before they decide to support him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The 7% undecideds---historically undecideds break for the newcomer
and not the incumbent.

I think it is tied up right now, if you allocate 60% of the undecideds to Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. At noon today, WUNC news said that the Nader folks only have
a few more days to turn his petition (w/100K sigs) in order to be on the ballot, so you're correct.

Of course, it could still happen- additionally, they apparently only need 500 sigs to have him eligible as a write-in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Literate Tar Heel Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. even if Nader gets on
I don't think there are many votes for him here ... maybe a couple hundred in Orange County and less in Mecklenburg and Buncombe, perhaps New Hanover, but barely worth the time to even try to get the signatures (there's no way in hell he can get 100K signatures without a concerted effort from the Republican party anyway)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Agreed-
Esp re: New Hanover- Frankly, I see him as more of a liability for Bush than for Kerry. There are many, many R's who reeeeeallly don't want to vote for Dub again but can't quite commit to Kerry. Nobody really knows what Nader's positions are and, since he's no longer associated with the Greens, he would provide these voters the same out that Perot did in '92, on a much smaller scale... IMO, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Literate Tar Heel Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. that's possible
I was thinking of the hippies and young disillusioned voters who want to make a statement against the whole process by going for Nader, and I think there will be far far fewer of those than there would have been in 2000 if he had been on the ballot ... I think a lot of those Republicans you're talking about would probably vote for the Libertarian Badnarik before Nader (Browne, the Libertarian candidate in 2000 polled around 1-2% in the Triangle)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Literate Tar Heel Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. actually I just saw
that the Charlotte Observer was reporting today that Nader only has 15K signatures and will only be a write-in candidate in N.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Thx for the update
That should tighten things up a little more. Also, agreed w/your above comments about Libertarian support- when I lived in Wilm about 10 years ago (has it been that long!?) there was a fair amount of support for both him and Perot among the folks I knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. how can the poll Nader, he on what 2 ballots
and he has until 5pm TODAY to submit 30,000 sigs to be on MI ballot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. i know that was good news for kerry
yes yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. The last CNN poll taken in NC was totally wrong!
NC does have a chance of winning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yeah, CNN didn't even bring up its stupid inaccurate poll
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 12:45 PM by Lex
.
from earlier this week.

CNN only discussed the Mason-Dixon poll, which came out yesterday evening, and Mason-Dixon is a long-time pollster in the state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Absolutely!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was looking at that, and read about Fox's "seven suitcases" here
Sorry, I think they will MIHOP... they are getting desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. The only way Bush can win Michigan is if the terrorists attack Detroit.
Michigan's economy has suffered greatly under his administration. He's not getting many votes in the largest city, the arab-americans have turned against him (they voted for him last time), and it basically comes down to how Oakland and Macomb counties vote.

If he can find a way to supress the votes in Detroit/Wayne County, he could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The people must demand to have their votes counted
if there IS an attack somewhere, the people there should fight that much harder to have their votes counted. We can't cede an inch of ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why do you think they are going "nucular" with the threats now? This
is becoming the ONLY WAY THEY ARE GOING TO WIN.
I heard Kerry at the NAACP: HE IS ENERGIZED has a good message, and is a much better alternative to the chimp.

Prepare yourselves... me thinks something is coming down the pike...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossfish Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Why does a terrorist attack help Bush?
I just don't get it. Since 'terra' is all the guy can say, it would seem that if another attack happens, he should be held accountable. After all, we have that rainbow thingy and all.

I know this is the conventional wisdom and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They can use it as an excuse
to declare marshall law and install the chimp* as dictator for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmkinsey Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. I've been thinking the same
Ridge said that "terrorists will try to influence our election".
It seems that they should be called out to explain their reasoning.
What makes Tom Ridge believe that terrorists want to "influence our election" and why does HE think that terrorists think an attack will be a blow to *. (Ridge's implied argument)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I agree with you!
9/11 was so unexpected that it shocked everyone senseless. We were reeling with sadness. If it happens again I am certain the reaction would be totally different. There would be massive rage at Bush for not having gone after Bin Laden and Al Qeada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Why would people vote for the ass who failed to protect them a second time
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 12:49 PM by FighttheFuture
Really... I'll tell you this - I'm sick of their bullshit. If America isn't attacked before the election, I'm voting for John Kerry. And if America is attacked before the election, I'm voting for John Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The fear, and I can fully understand it, is that everybody's immediate
reaction is "WE GOTTA STAND BEHIND OUR PRESIDENT!!!" And everybody closes ranks because it's the first thing they think of to do. It happened once, already, as we've all seen. Look at how the opposition in Congress melted away. Look at how even in other countries the instant reaction was "Today, we are ALL Americans."

Granted, in other countries, we've squandered that good will so thoroughly that it won't come up again. This time they'll probably be of the opinion that we had it coming.

But America will thick-headedly and steadfastly stick our chins in the air and our heels in the ground and stand defiantly with "Our President." Us Versus Them. Yer with us or agin us.

That's the main reason why Osama and the others are probably VERY hopeful that bush gets reelected - because he's their dream-come-true recruitment inducement. He's played straight into their hands, and they know it. They seem to be VERY astute judges of character, and character flaws and foibles. That's exactly what I'd expect much of America to do. Terrorist strike? Hey, all bets are off. All differences aside. We're WITH george here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I think people would be so mad that it happened a 2nd
time that they would want to immediately give him his walking papers. An attack before the elections would definitely swing in favor of Kerry. People are tired of this crap and know that a change is needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. I get depressed knowing people watch Wolf. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. If I were GOP I'd be depressed because they're not dumping Bush
If I were a republican I'd be vehemently insisting that the party dump Bush altogether and replace him with somebody else.

No joke.

That's assuming anyone in the republican party has an IQ over 90 or an actual sense of reality that isn't completely warped by delusion.

Bush is the biggest crook/loser to come down the pike in this country EVER.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Well said! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. If I were republican, I'd be depressed on principle
it's gotta be axiomatic...republican? depressed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC