My Response to a Freeper Who Attacked Teresa-Heinz Kerry

[Neoplatonist]

I was listening to this Repuke Freeper ignoramous rambling on about Teresa Heinz-Kerry and her evil ways. I really let her have it. LOL.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's my take on why Repukes go after Hillary Clinton and now Teresa Heinz-Kerry.

Republicans love to attack women. What's more, Republican women are worse than their husbands at it; most learn it from their spouses and become even more sick in the head.

Most women hate their Republican husbands. When I say "hate," I am not being equivocal, nor speaking metaphorically. I am being univocal -- I literally mean "hate." Their husbands aren't for the most part (times) romantic or caring, or givers, mostly just takers -- selfish lovers and emotionally impotent. They are prejudicial against different races, religions, and frame of minds. I'm not generalizing, I'm being particular with particular Repukes as instances: G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, Bob Barr, Tom Delay, Dan Burton, Henry Hyde, Bill O'reilly and other pathetic representatives of the Repuke Party and their lonely sick wives. A thread of resemblance and irrational sickness runs through them all. Most Republican women therefore begin to not only act like their heartless husbands, they end up resembling them in facial features and emotions -- sick emotions appear in physical traits with spiritually abused souls. Examples?: overweight people, drug abusers, alcohol abusers, physically abused persons, emotionally abused persons, and, yes, emotionally politically abused persons as well. Also, most good souls become bad one's in the presense of other bad souls -- peer pressure overwhelms in complexes of compresence, or rather, families and social circles. A bad apple tends to rot the whole bunch.

Do Democrats attack G.W. Bush's wife? Yes, I've heard Democrats criticize the way she dresses and her bogus naive innocence. She's an abused subserviant, that's blatantly obvious. Have they done so at this NG? Not that I can recall. You know why that is? It's because Democrats have good hearts and souls where it counts. And that is precisely why the Democratic Party receives the majority of the womens' vote in elections. That is why the Minority Leader in the House of Representatives, soon to be Speaker, is a Democratic woman. Strong souls are appreciated by the Democratic Party. And some women are strong, so we love them. Teresa Heinz-Kerry and Hillary Clinton are beloved because they are strong. That is why most of the female senators are Democrats, and why Hillary Clinton, who took so much abuse from Repukes for 12 straight years was elected by a landslide in New York as senator.

Americans know who represents women -- it's not the Repuke Party. They use women as a means to an end, and love to hate women, whether it's freedom of choice, giving them equal pay for equal work, or passing and enforcing laws against sexual discrimination and physically abused women, or simple things like giving free contraceptions and sex education to the underpriviled. Hell, Bush just appointed a Southern judge who further victimizes rape victims in his rhetoric and decisions. If a Repuke can't beat a Democratic male, they then turn and abuse his wife. Hillary? Teresa? Who's next? Obviously Elizabeth Edwards if John becomes president. It's already started. Repukes love the drug-addict Rush Limbaugh, thrice divorced I might ad, who called Chelsea Clinton a "dog" on national TV when Chelsea was 13 years old. He also attacks Teresa and Elizabeth on his hate-filled radio show.

Attack the woman who's strong enough to run for office, not her husband who's not. Attack the man who's running for office, not his wife who's not. Absolutely pathetic.

Joseph
            

[stldemocrat]

1. 100% Correct

[readmylips]

2. Teresa was a great rich republican, when republican...

now the repigs want to eat her alife. Terese will get back at them for sure.

[calimary]

3. And don't forget - one of the biggest advertisers on the limbaugh

show is VIAGRA. And of course, Bob Dole (no Democrat he) was the company's choice for spokesman.

HELLO!?!?!? I guess republi-CON men need all the help they can get.

It's also worth remembering that, during the time they were persecuting Clinton for cheating on Hillary with a consenting-adult single woman, some of his most vicious critics had left marital wreckage of ALL kinds in their own paths - many of which involved divorces (their own, and/or SOMEBODY ELSE'S), out-of-wedlock children they fathered and either abandoned or support with absentee funding that I suspect is very likely MUCH-begrudged and reluctant, and in some cases, MULTIPLE marriages. Clinton never broke up anybody else's marriage, or abandoned his wife. And he certainly didn't kick her when she was down, like newt gingrich did with the wife he was eager to throw away - presenting her with divorce papers while she was in the hospital suffering from cancer. Cute, 'eh? Despite what the wrong-wing would have you believe, he never fathered any child other than Chelsea - with - gee, guess whom? HIS WIFE.

And it does make me wonder why the apoplexy into which these vermin heave themselves - whenever the notion or example of a strong, independent, intelligent, and capable woman crosses their paths. Hillary Clinton and Teresa Heinz Kerry come immediately to mind. They didn't care much for Rosalyn Carter, either. OR even Nancy Reagan, when it was perceived that she was just a little too powerful for their comfort. Good HEAVENS, HOW THREATENED they are! SHEESH!!! What does THAT tell you? I'm certainly not threatened by women like these. I welcome them and salute them, and hope I can be more like them. And women like them certainly never made my husband feel threatened, either.

REAL men are MAN ENOUGH for magnificent women like them. And you're far more likely to find REAL men in the Democratic Party. The poseurs and stuffed shirts and gotta-knock-her-down-so-I-look-taller types are in their misbegotten safe haven - the GOP.

[Neoplatonist]

4. Exactly, Calimary.

Hypocrisy knows no bounds with Repukes. Lets face facts: Conservatism is a sickness. And come November, we're going to cure the sickness in America!

[Cats Against Frist]

5. Besides this part:

"sick emotions appear in physical traits with spiritually abused souls. Examples?: overweight people, drug abusers, alcohol abusers, physically abused persons, emotionally abused persons, and, yes, emotionally politically abused persons as well."

you did OK, though I would caution using the word "soul," and trying to combine it with a psychological assesment.

Kind of makes you sound crazy.

[Neoplatonist]

8. I am a bit crazy -- I am a philosopher. LOL.

I study contemporary analytical philosophy, especially metaphysics of modality, epistemology, and symbolic logic. Where I'm weak is in philosophical psychology. I'm good with qualities and relations, but am still learning theories. I'll try to be more analytical next time in my examples, and go further in depth and breadth in the matters. Sorry about that.

I was thinking about overweight people eating so much to fill a void -- spiritual/mental pains. Drug abusers abusing drugs because of perhaps childhood sexual abuse, physical or mental abuse. I was trying to get across how abuse strips away self-esteem and makes one feel less than... Anyway, you were certainly correct in bringing my lack of depth to light.

But remember, I am a bit crazy. LOL. I'm a metaphysical realist who believes in bundle theory, defends realism against nominalists attacks on some truth conditional staments being undecidable, and multiple exemplified enties, i.e., universals which exemplify qualities (predicates) in particular objects. I believe in quantum physics being essential to any quality metaphysical theory, such as space-time points, or rather instants, with complete complex of compresence of overlapping events in each instant. I believe we are space-time worms burrowing through the space-time continuum. And our past particulars are slices of particular instants of our past parts. It's amazing I'm not crazier than I am.

[in_cog_ni_to]

6. I loved Teresa's remark the other day...

She was responding to the remarks about how wealthy Kerry and Edwards are and said, "My money was fine and dandy when I was a Republican, but now it's not?" I want Teresa to be Prez! I truly adore that woman....she's got chutzpah!

[Cleita]

7. I keep thinking it's time for a girl's march on something.

Nevermind we "girls" are probably a bit older. I hate to see all the women being attacked now, Hillary forever, Martha and now Theresa?

[gauguin57]

9. I loved Teresa's statement about her marriage

One of the news magazine hosts was interviewing her, and said, "Do you have a good marriage?", expecting, I'm sure, the stock, "Oh, yes, we're still honeymoonin'!"

But, instead, Teresa hit it out of the park. She said, "We have a grown-up marriage," and went on to say that she and John Kerry met as more mature adults who knew more of what to expect from marriage. They'd been married to other people and had raised their children, and they expected different things from marriage than young, moony-eyed romantics. So, she said, they are a good team.

I became Teresa's number one fan right then and there. She could have given the Stepford Wife answer (to make herself look more like Laura Bush, the subservient), but instead she told the truth.

They hated Hillary because Hillary had separate political ambitions (and "we didn't elect her blah blah blah). Teresa doesn't have those ambitions. So what in the hell is their problem this time? Y'know, when you think about it, Teresa, having been married to two senators, probably knows her way around Washington better than George W. Bush STILL does after 3 and a half years there!