|
Edited on Fri Jul-16-04 04:12 PM by demo@midlife
(The Americans with Disabilities Act). As far as I can recall, the same Supreme Court who gave the White House to the Chimp have tried to water it down. And whatever looks good on his record usually hides a story, like some of the other republicans who have tried to defeat important legislation. That stuff just doesn't get mentioned. Here are a few things I found you can pass on to her: Bush’s Budget Slashes Programs for Americans with DisabilitiesIn his FY 2005 budget, President Bush cut funding for a number of programs that assist individuals with disabilities. These programs include:
Star schools - $20 Million Cut. Arts in education - $35 Million Cut. Recreational Programs - $2.5 Million Cut. Projects With Industry - $22 Million Cut. Supported Employment State Grants - $38 Million Cut. Demonstration Projects to Ensure Quality Higher Education for Students with Disabilities - $7 Million Cut.
Despite Promises to Support Mental Health Parity, Bush Lets GOP Leaders Kill Wellstone Mental Health Equitable Act. President Bush announced his qualified support for the Senator Wellstone Mental Health Equitable Act in April 2002, but only for “serious” mental illness which he chose not to define. The legislation has been blocked by Republican Speaker of the House Denny Hastert, who believes it would cost businesses too much to cover mental illness. When Senate Democrats tried to bring the bill up for a vote on October 25, 2003, the one year anniversary of Senator Wellstone’s death, Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist refused to allow the bill to be considered.
Consortium of Over 100 National Disability Organizations “Strongly Opposed” to Bush’s Medicaid Changes. Bush’s 2004 budget proposed that Medicaid funding be disbursed directly to states in the form of block grants, in effect transfering administrative control of Medicaid from the federal government to individual states. According to the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, an organization comprised of over 100 national disability organizations, Medicaid can only be fairly implemented if supervised by the federal government. Bush’s proposal to remove Medicaid programs from federal oversight “will give states unlimited discretion to limit access to health and long-term services and supports that these individuals need” and will “deconstruct and eviscerate a program that has been the lifeblood of millions of children and adults with disabilities and their families.” <snip>
Bush Judicial Nominee Argued that the Americans with Disabilities Act Was “Not Needed.” In April 2003, a divided Senate confirmed Bush’s nomination of Jeffrey Sutton to a lifetime seat on the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Sutton, a former clerk to conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, argued in 2000 before the Supreme Court that the ADA “was not needed.” A divided court sided with Sutton’s client and ruled that disabled state workers cannot sue for damages under the ADA.
More at: http://www.johnkerry.com/communities/awd/wrecord.html
----------------------------------------------------------------- Compare with Kerry: JOHN KERRY'S POLICY PLATFORM AND VISION FOR AMERICA “I am proud to have been part of the team of people with disabilities, parents of children with disabilities and others who advised the Senator and helped shaped what I believe is a historic and comprehensive blueprint for ensuring the first class citizenship of all Americans with disabilities… As Justin Dart told us many times: ‘We must vote as if our lives depend on it because they do.’ That is why I am supporting John Kerry and I hope you will too”.
--Bob Williams Disability Leader Former Director, The Office on Disability, Aging and Long Term Care Policy at HHS
John Kerry believes that all Americans, including those with disabilities, have an inherent right to be treated as first class citizens of our nation. He believes we should not be investing in tax giveaways for the wealthiest Americans while the IDEA is underfunded and Medicaid is in danger of being weakened. John Kerry will work to strengthen Medicaid – and make it work better for people with disabilities through bills like MiCASSA, the Money Follows the Person Act, and the Family Opportunity Act. He will also strengthen Medicare for people with disabilities. He will strenuously oppose the far right’s efforts to undermine the Americans with Disabilities Act and other critical civil rights laws by appointing judges that will protect the rights they provide. Qualified individuals with disabilities will play a pivotal role in a Kerry Administration. As President, John Kerry will fully fund IDEA and promote creative solutions to address the transportation, technology, and housing needs of individuals with disabilities. <snip>
Health Care and Community Living Protect / Strengthen Medicaid: Strengthen Medicare:
Employment Opportunities We need to have a more focused effort on recruiting and employing people with disabilities in America.
Civil Rights Enforcement Enforcement by the Department of Justice: Clarifying the insurance safe harbor: Enacting civil rights tax relief: Opposing the ADA Notification Act: Support legislation to reverse Buckhannon:
Education Strengthening “IDEA”: “Mandatory” Full-Funding: Strong Enforcement and Real Compliance: Maintain Accountability for Special Education: Promote Participation in Service Learning: Improve Access to Higher Education: Improve Transitional Planning:
Promote Access and Awareness in Disability Services Improve Service Coordination: Provide Work-Study Alternatives: Collect data on students with disabilities:
Transportation Over The Road Busses (OTRBs): Paratransit: Mass Transit/Transit Authorities: Air Transportation: Taxi Service: Private Carriers and Ground Transportation: Automobiles: Accessible vehicles: Training for Consumers in Integrated Transportations Options: Expanding Project ACTION:
Technology Technology as a Tool for Independence: Funding for Technology: Technology and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Enforcing telecommunications accessibility laws: Telework and Telecommuting:
Housing Lifetime Homes and Universal or Inclusive Design: Public Housing Accommodations: Housing Vouchers: Home ownership: Olmstead Decision:
Veterans
Voting Accessibility
http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/awd/americanswithdisabilities.html-------------------------------------------------------------------- Also ask her if she wants someone in office who continues to appoint judges/justices like this: Bush Turns To Opponents Of ADA To Fill Crucial Positions ZNet | Disability_ Rights July 25, 2002
<snip> Bush-appointed opponents of the ADA and other disability rights laws include:
-- Attorney General John Ashcroft who, as Senator, took the lead role in trying to weaken the due process protections afforded children and youth with disabilities by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Ashcroft's Justice Department has taken the wrong side in Supreme Court disability cases and has done little to enforce the ADA.
-- Eugene Scalia Bush's controversial recess appointee to Solicitor at the Department of Labor. Scalia has made a career out of representing big business against employees and has sought to limit the scope of the ADA. He has called federal ergonomics regulations proposed to prevent disabilities in the workplace "junk science."
-- Bush's Interior Secretary, Gale Norton, who advocated for states' rights by claiming that "we lost too much" when the South was defeated in the Civil War. (Independence Institute Speech, 1996) Norton also threatened to sue the federal government for forcing Colorado to add a wheelchair ramp to the statehouse under the ADA, calling it "a really ugly addition to the state capitol."
-- Linda Chavez, Bush's first pick for Secretary of Labor, ridiculed the ADA as 'special treatment in the name of accommodating the disabled.'" (AP, Jan. 5, 2001) Chavez runs the Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO), whose legal counsel, Roger Glegg, has repeatedly attacked the ADA for what he calls its "dubious rationale and its silly results" and believes Congress should at least exclude protections for people with "mental impairments." (The Public Interest, June 1st, 1999)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=47&ItemID=2388
-------------------------------------------------------------------- The ADA is Still Under Attack (From the National Association of the Deaf website) By Kelby N. Brick, Esq. Associate Executive Director Law and Advocacy Center
The new Congress in 2003 means new bills for us to support and to watch out for. Congress members will also be trying to bring up old issues that failed in the past. They are hoping to get them passed while consumers are busy with the various snowstorms and terrorist threats here in DC. Fortunately, the NAD is always vigilant and will work to ensure that individuals like you are always aware of what is going on.
Congressman Mark Foley of Florida recently reintroduced his ADA Notification Act (H.R. 728). In the past, strong opposition by disability organizations and the NAD have blocked his act. And he’s still trying to take your rights away!
"What is the ADA Notification Act?" This bill would ban individuals from filing a lawsuit against any public places of accommodation (such as hospitals, hotels, airports, lawyer’s offices, museums and sports events) that have discriminated against them. According to the ADA Notification Act, the person who was discriminated against will be required to first inform the business where discrimination occurred, then give the place 90 days to "promise" that the discrimination will not happen again. If another person later suffers discrimination, that person must then give the business another 90 days to "promise" discrimination will not happen again.
<snip> "But don’t businesses deserve warnings?" The ADA was passed almost 13 years ago. Everyone knows or should know the ADA requirements by now. Do you think that 13 years is not enough time for a lot of warnings? The NAD thinks that 13 years is plenty of time.
<snip> If this law is passed, businesses will decide not to take the initiative to follow the law. They will just wait for a "letter" from people and then "promise" not to do it again. Is that good enough for you?
http://www.nad.org/openhouse/action/eow/vol2no2.htmlThe information contained within this issue of Eye on Washington may be distributed freely and reprinted, provided credit is given to the NAD.
|