|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
southernleftylady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 08:55 PM Original message |
Forgive me if this has been posted but i just saw this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redleg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Holy crap. Perhaps those "bunker busters" were low-yield tactical nukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DieboldMustDie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. If "low-yield tactical nukes" had been used... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redleg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. The article does say "radioactive weapons." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh, man. We just do whatever the hell we please, don't we. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill Wade (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Yep. But its nothing new, we've been doing whatever the hell we please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. This was posted quite a while ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DieboldMustDie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. The BBC headline said nothing about nuclear weapons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redleg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yes, but it did say "radioactive." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 01:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Pardon, but this appears to be the BBC headline: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Mightily they were smitten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-17-04 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. of all the hideous things BushCo has done in the past three years . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 06:21 AM Response to Original message |
13. Hey, don't get yer knickers in a twist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC