Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From John Kerry: 'America The Vulnerable'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 03:02 PM
Original message
From John Kerry: 'America The Vulnerable'
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 03:03 PM by WilliamPitt
Press release from the Kery campaign, received via email.

==

For Immediate Release
July 18, 2004

America the Vulnerable
How Our Government is Failing to Protect Us from Terrorism

With the long awaited release of the 9/11 Commission report expected
this week, the Bush administration's post 9/11 homeland security efforts
will be front and center. A new book by Stephen Flynn, a former
national security official in the administrations of George H.W. Bush
and Bill Clinton, coming out in stores this week offers a stunning
indictment of the White House's failed efforts over the last three years
to address major security vulnerabilities in America. This is at least
the sixth book to be released this year detailing George Bush's lack of
attention and focus on the nation's security.

"Homeland security has entered our post-9/11 lexicon, but homeland
insecurity remains the abiding reality."

"Despite all the rhetoric, after the initial flurry of activity to
harden cockpit doors and confiscate nail clippers, there has been little
appetite in Washington to move beyond government reorganization and
color-coded alerts."

"The measures we have been cobbling together are hardly fit to deter
amateur thieves, vandals, and hackers, never mind determined
terrorists."

"Worse still, small improvements are often oversold as giant steps
forward, lowering the guard of average citizens as they carry on their
daily routine with an unwarranted sense of confidence."

"The reality is that our old national security dogs are having a
difficult time learning new tricks."

- Stephen Flynn, America The Vulnerable


Core Failures of Post-9/11 Homeland Security Efforts

Homeland Security Spending Remains Small Relative to Overall Defense
Spending. "While we receive a steady diet of somber warnings about
potential terrorist attacks, the new federal outlays for homeland
security in the two years after 9/11 command an investment equal to only
4 percent of the Pentagon's annual budget.

Focus on Fighting Terrorism Abroad Inadequate To Address Terrorist
Threat. "When it comes to confronting terrorism, the United States is
going through its own version of the Phony War. Despite the periodic
raising of the terror-alert level, our marching orders as citizens are
to keep shopping and traveling. Instead of mobilizing a defense against
enemies who are intent on targeting innocent civilians and critical
infrastructure, the US government is placing its faith in familiar
national security formulas. Washington is acting on the false premise
that the terrorist threat can be contained by taking the battle to the
enemy, in overseas efforts to isolate and topple rogue states, and by
hunting down the al Qaeda leadership." < p.38>

Agencies that Shoulder the Domestic Security Burden Lack the Staffing,
Training or Equipment to do their Job. "The Coast Guard is charged with
protecting 95,000 miles of shoreline and an 'Exclusive Economic Zone'
that extends two hundred miles off-shore covering 3.36 million square
miles, with a force about the same size as the New York police
department, deployed on a fleet of vessels that are among the oldest of
the thirty-seven navies around the world." "The number of customs
inspectors assigned to policing the millions of tons of freight that
entire our country each day has been relatively flat since the early
1990s, even though the volume of trade almost tripled during that same
period and its law enforcement mission grew as well." "Law enforcement
agencies like the FBI continue to face such basic problems as field
agents who lack internet access and the means to receive e-mail
attachments." "The one area to which the federal government
has been most visibly dedicating its attention and resources since
September 11 - aviation security - remains frighteningly incomplete."


State and Local Fiscal Crises Undermine Efforts To Improve Emergency
Preparedness. "Most states and cities are in their worst fiscal shape in
fifty years, and few see any bright spots on the horizon....Clearly,
when California is confronting multibillion-dollar deficits, and Oregon
is shrinking the public school year and trimming vital health services
for the elderly, they are in no position to find the resources to invest
in training and new equipment for first responders, or to make new
capital investments to protect critical infrastructure."

* First Responders Underresourced and Unable To Meet New Security
Threats. "Outside of Washington, pink slips for police officers and
firefighters are more common than new public investments in security.
With state and local budget hemorrhaging red ink, mayors, county
commissioners, and governors are simply in no position to fill the
security void the federal government has been keen to thrust upon them."


* States Unprepared For Biological Attack. "With so many of our
homeland security efforts, they come with too few resources to address
the need. Surveillance systems should be up an running in all our major
metropolitan areas....If a biological weapon is released in an urban
area that is not being monitored, a contagious disease could spread into
multiple states before the first alarm is sounded."

* Local Hospitals Unprepared for Potential Outbreak of Contagious
Disease. "An August 2003 report on hospital preparedness, put out by the
US general Account Office, found that most urban hospitals had a
shortage of equipment, medical stockpiles, and quarantine and isolation
facilities for even a small-scale response to a contagious disease
outbreak....The American Hospital Association estimates that it would
take an investment of $8 billion to bring all metropolitan hospitals up
to a point where they could provide acute care in the event of a
nuclear, biological, or chemical attack.... Our fire and police
departments would almost certainly be overwhelmed as well."

* Inadequate Availability of Protective Gear. "There is also a
shortage of protective gear and portable detection equipment...Most
communities report that within six hours, they will run out of even the
most basic emergency resources, such as life-saving equipment, personal
protective suits, oxygen, and respirators."

* Inadequate Attention to and Resources for Training of First
Responders. "Major field exercises are important tools to test the
adequacy of contingency plans, equipment, command-and-control
procedures, and training. In all but America's largest cities, there is
a paucity of resources and expertise to conduct these large-scale
exercises. Important specialized training is also in woefully short
supply."

Critical Infrastructure Vulnerable. "This tepid, piecemeal approach to
container security is not exceptional. The situation is little better
in the other vital sectors that support our daily lives, such as energy
pipelines, power generation and distribution, information technology
infrastructure, food and water supplies, public health, and toxic
production and transport. In all these areas, no single government
entity has an uncontested charter to call all the security shorts. Nor
is there a standard by which to measure progress."

* Aviation Security Remains Incomplete. "The tons of air freight
being loaded in the belly of most commercial airliners continues to fly
the American skies virtually uninspected."
* Borders Remain Porous. "The result is a border region that has
become more difficult to police and one which terrorists could readily
exploit to get their operatives into the United States."

Failure to Implement Security Standards for Industries Handling
Sensitive & Dangerous Materials. "In 2002, federal inspectors found
seven vials of the pathogens that cause bubonic plague and pneumonic
plague in an unlocked refrigerator...When pneumonic plague becomes
airborne it is almost 100-percent fatal. Its victims usually die within
48 hours. What is needed right away are federally mandated standards
that require security plans for labs that hold these dangerous
substances."

* Chemical Industry Has Resisted Stringent Security Requirements.
"According to the EPA, there are 823 sites where the death or injury
toll from a catastrophic disaster at a chemical plant could reach from
100,000 to more than 1 million people....There are no federal laws that
establish minimum security standards at chemical facilities. After
9/11, Senator Jon Corzine of New Jersey drafted legislation that would
require chemical companies to identify the vulnerabilities in their
operations and prepare security plans to address them....The chemical
industry rallied nearly thirty trade associations from manufacturing and
agricultural groups to oppose these new requirements." Note:
Bush supported weaker legislation backed by the industry and took nearly
$1 million in campaign contributions from industry leaders.

Stephen Flynn served in the White House Military Office during the
George H.W. Bush Administration and was director for Global Issues on
the National Security Staff during the Clinton Administration.

"America the Vulnerable is a stunningly detailed account of the threat
of terrorism to the American people. As one who has been involved with
this subject for a number of years, I can honestly say that I have never
seen such a starkly realistic and accurate account of the threat of
terrorism to our very way of life." -Warren Rudman, former GOP Senator

"America the Vulnerable will grip you, intrigue you, frighten you, and
inspire you. Steve Flynn is a genuine export on the terrorist threats
facing America" -Norman Ornstein, Conservative Scholar, American
Enterprise Institute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry continues to co-opt the "war on terra" meme....
Rather than point out the emperor's lack of clothing, Kerry races to get naked too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. *very* well put!
ROTFLOLASTC!!

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Read it again, it is all about Bush's lack of clothing
Bush is all about "foreign intervention"

this is all about equiping first responders, protecting our chemical plants, ports, cyperspace, preparing hospitals, etc etc etc etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. nonetheless, Kerry is not only buying the scam...,
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 04:09 PM by mike_c
...he's helping to push it. The WOT is neo-con window dressing designed to market the interests of the MIC and justify anti-democratic foreign and domestic policies. The Democratic party challenger should be shining a light on the WOT lie, not working to entrench it deeper. We don't need a "fortress America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Mike, sadly, terrorism does exist.
and I for one want the US to be protected.

Agreed GWB is wrongheaded and uses WOT for his own agenda. And clearly GWB has made things worse w invasion and occupation of Iraq.

OTOH, I do not understand how preparing hospitals, equipping firefighters and examining shipping containers creates "Fortress America." Being sensible about security does not mean a violation of our civil rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. yes, terrorism exists, but a "war on terror" cannot be won...
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 05:03 PM by mike_c
...or even prosecuted honorably. The roots of terrorism cannot be stifled by violence.

Of course there's nothing wrong with ensuring a vigorous self-defense. That's not a war on anything, however-- and I agree that it's prudent, at the very least. But when framed in terms of a "war on terror" self defense and preparedness become part of a larger foreign and domestic policy context whose objectives are not nearly so benign as assuring sufficient funding for local fire departments. How about if we fund fire departments so that they're better at saving people's lives and property and address terrorism by working for international justice, e.g. by helping EVERYONE have access to efficient and responsive fire departments? It's a narrow analogy, but I'm sure you get my meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. agreed on many points n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. two words hommie
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 05:23 PM by bpilgrim
PATRIOT ACT.

sure it may sound swell but in the end it is all about setting up a POLICE STATE and they have already gone waaaaay too far imho.

but hell, as long as it makes us safer right :crazy:

sorry, i am willing to give our first responders what they need to save lives but when it comes to the patriot act and all its attendent statutes i want nothing to do with them.

shoot, the first responders have been left in the cold because all the elite really care about is keeping us all scared so we wont ask to many questions with all these changes going on.

i tell ya i don't trust them and i don't buy into this war on terrorism.

we started it and we are gonna just make it worse but RAPING TORTURING and MURDERING MORE foreigners and then we will wonder why they hate us.

nah, not for me... if that is the plan i am out of here good thing i have dual citizenship, eh ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. dude, you said "shoot the first responders"...!
Context is everything ;) .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. D'oh!
thnx ;-)

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Don't tell AssCrack!!!!!!!
he'll send the violation of punctuation patrol after you. . . .

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. For Voters, Osama Replaces the Common Criminal - NYT
By Eric Lichtblau, New York Times News Service
July 18, 2004

WASHINGTON — Murder rates are edging up around the country. In the shadow of the White House, the capital has suffered a rash of gang violence and car thefts, with five people shot in one attack last week. Police chiefs nationwide complain that federal officials are cutting the money they need to protect their cities.

But you won't hear much talk about these problems from either George W. Bush or John F. Kerry, his Democratic rival for the presidency. Crime, once as much a staple of campaigns as the sight of politicians kissing babies, has become perhaps the biggest non-issue of the 2004 election.

(snip)

But the overriding explanation is that crime has simply fallen under the emotional shadow of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Willie Horton, the rapist made notorious by Mr. Bush's father in the 1988 campaign, has been replaced by Osama bin Laden as the poster boy for what ails America.

Few challenge the grave importance of terrorism as an over-arching issue that will define the 2004 campaign. But the lack of political attention given to much more common crime grates at longtime law enforcement leaders like Hubert Williams, a former police chief and president of the Police Foundation, a Washington group that studies law enforcement issues, and they are beginning to bring their concerns to the surface.

Mr. Williams says the threat of terrorism issue is "an emotional hot-button" that diverts politicians from addressing gun violence and drug trafficking, even as police departments are pressed to devote more money to counterterrorism. "We've got serious problems that are not being addressed on the crime front, and neither party is doing much to deal with it," he said. "There's a real frustration within the law enforcement community that these issues are not even being discussed."

more...
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/weekinreview/18eric.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. yeah, WTF is up with that?
WP why r U PUSH'n it HERE :crazy:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Okay.
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 04:10 PM by stellanoir
After 9/11, we became painfully aware that two (possibly three) big bad bloated intelligence agencies were malfunctioning and not talking to one another. So * created a third (or 4th). Still waiting for someone to enlighten me to the subtle differences of "Homeland Security" versus "National Security." We don't need more agencies. We need organizations that function efficiently.

Terrorism czar my butt. One counterterrorism meeting prior to 9/11 might have helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bad, Bad Title
Is he trying to outdo Tom Ridge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. it is the title of Stephen Flynn's book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Flynn's Not Running for Pres
Kerry, OTOh ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Neither is WilliamPitt but that's who titled the Thread n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. does it talk about changing our policies abroad?
or how to set up the police state at home?

if it is BS about more police and security at home it is still the wrong msg.

the only msg i take away from all this is to move out the country im sure i ain't the only one.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Straw man
Securing the nation so that we are less vulnerable to terrorism does not mean that we must "set up the police state at home."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. you call the PATRIOT ACT a strawman if you want to but it is REAL
but whatever, i only asked if it talked about increasing security at home... and guess what, if it does i want no parts of it.

i don't trust any of our current leaders. i am not bringing up my children in a security obsessed police state if i can help it.

now, if we want to talk about changing our foreign policy thats a different matter... but that would be OUT OF THE QUESTION right... that means the terrorist would WIN :crazy:

the cartoon world view makes all our lives MORE dangerous not LESS and i am not playing into that scam, sorry.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. How does preparing a hospital or upping inspections of shipping containers
take away your freedom? Or equipping fire fighters?

I haven't read the book but I saw Flynn on MTP. Seemed like a reasonable guy.

He said civil rights vs more security of infrastructure was a false dichotomy.

In so many words said Iraq war was a distraction . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. yeah, they always make it sound swell but i ain't drinking it
sorry, and the more reasonable they are the more closely you had better watch out.

think how much things have changed since 911... sorry i aint raising my kids in a land of fear and security obsessions that is a life not worth living.

maybe i am too old fashioned... you know what they say, you can't teach and old dog new tricks.

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Skepticism is always a good thing
But I always like to hear about books that point out the !!!!!FAILURES!!!!! of GWB.

Which is basically what this boils down too. . .like the whole section in F911 about the one guy patrolling the coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC