Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Democratic Presidential Candidate Who Was Never Elected Would You

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:09 PM
Original message
Poll question: What Democratic Presidential Candidate Who Was Never Elected Would You
Vote For?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other: Dukakis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. Other: MONDALE n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Other: Mondale...
...but given that there're only two other votes recorded in the poll, I have to wonder whether the poll has a verifiable paper trial and, if not, whether it is a Diebold product ;).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bobby
without interference from the evil conspiracy thet killed him, JFK and MLK, one can only imagine the course our country would have taken........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is so obvious
RFK by a mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Not that obvious
My first vote ever was for Gene McCarthy - Bobby got into that campaign only after McCarthy had broken the path. It felt opportunistic to me at the time, and still does. McCarthy was a much deeper, more complex person (still is) who would've made a very non-standard issue sort of president. RFK was mainline east coast crew. Many of their stands do not strike me as liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. All of them, except Henry Wallace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. Henry Wallace? Funny you should mention him
A friend on another forum posted something he wrote in 1944. I was impressed. I didn't know anything about him.

Henry Wallace, 1944 <http://newdeal.feri.org/wallace/haw23.htm>:

The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.
. . . .
American fascism will not be really dangerous until there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the deliberate poisoners of public information, and those who stand for the K.K.K. type of demagoguery.
. .
Still another danger is represented by those who, paying lip service to democracy and the common welfare, in their insatiable greed for money and the power which money gives, do not hesitate surreptitiously to evade the laws designed to safeguard the public from monopolistic extortion.
. . . .
The American fascists are most easily recognized by their deliberate perversion of truth and fact. Their newspapers and propaganda carefully cultivate every fissure of disunity, every crack in the common front against fascism.
. . .
They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution.

They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. You have made me review my vote.
I guess I didn't research it carefully. Maybe it would have been much better if Wallace were Vice President when FDR died. I have a lot of reading to do. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Slight error in poll
Edited on Tue Aug-19-03 09:13 PM by wuushew
Al Gore was elected, he simply failed to become President due to well known and dark forces at play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saoirse Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. RFK All The Way!!!
What a president he would have been!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. ALL, but al gore WAS elected
i would vote for them all, but al gore was elected president. that's why the scalia bunch had to appoint the chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. We Were Posting The Same Thing Simultaneously.
Get out your tin foil hat, J17! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. But Gore Was Elected.
DemocratSinceBirth, wouldn't you agree?

Add Huey P. Long to your list and I'd vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I Agree
You like the Kingfish, eh

Every man a king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Love the Kingfish!
Have you seen Ken Burns' filmography on HPL? It's great and ends with Randy Newman's "Evangeline".

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raenelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. That's why I voted for McGovern instead of Gore--Gore doesn't
belong in the category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. McGovern!
A truly great American. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. That's pretty revealing
that you would prefur an athoritarian socialist to RFK or others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Huey Wasn't A Socialist.
But in the history of the U.S., I'd have to say that he governed as close to one as I know of.

I don't know what was "pretty revealing". Everyone on the DU has known for years that I am a socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. hey hey hey........Gore WAS elected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I can't help but wonder what had Humphrey defeated Nixon
in the 1968 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The Popular Vote Was Close
The Electoral College wasn't as close.

And the Wallace vote came out of Nixon's hide

Fast forward to 72. McGovern doesn't do much worse than Humphrey . He gets 38% to Humphrey's 42%.

Nixon gets all the Rep. vote and the Wallace vote of disaffected Dems and swing voters too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. He would've been a great president
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pocho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. ADLAI GOT MY FIRST IN 1952
Thanks for the chance to repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xequals Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. RFK, no question about it he would've won
and history would've been very different... we'd have MUCH stronger party. The chaos of '68 and '72 did a lot to weaken the party.. had all sorts of destabilizing ripple effects. With a strong leader to rally around, someone loved across the political spectrum like RFK, one can only imagine how much stronger the Democratic Party would be today. Reagan and the conservative revolution (which continues to this day) would've never happened. IMO, more than anything, the conservative revolution was more of a judgement against the circus-like Democratic Party of the late '60s and '70s (and '80s to some extent).

ps. I didn't choose President Gore because, after all, he did win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And if RFK's ideas had been implemented in 1968
along with MLK's, we would have had a much more peaceful and egalitarian society today.

Watch the spring 1968 portion of Eyes on the Prize 2 to see what we lost that year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shanty Oilish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. Al Smith
Grandpa bequeathed me an Al Smith button & I've been waiting for just the occasion to wear it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfkennedy Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
24. RFK ------Al Gore was elected president
I would of voted for RFK.

Al Gore was elected president. He was to liberal for the powers that be so they stole it from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. *** NO WAY on Bobby *** - any of the others MUCH better!
Bobby marketed himself well. However, read some books that aren't "Kennedy worship" (and even some of them discuss it), and you'll read of an angry, vindictive, corrupt man who would have abused the office maybe even as much as the man who won in 1968. Bobby's history:

1.) Dirty tricks in 1960 in West Virginia and Illinois - HE was the one who did the bargaining with the mob.

2.) Later repaid his mobster friends by going after another mob family. (Noble, but was HARDLY altruistic.)

3.) Was a staffer for Senator Joseph McCarthy and was always a leftist witch-hunter. Defended McCarthy on many occasions.

4.) Misused the Justice Department in petty political ways to "get even" with his enemies.

5.) Didn't have the guts to fire J. Edgar Hoover. Why??????? There were many reasons, but it came down to Bobby didn't have the GUTS. Because Hoover had the "goods" on the Kennedy corruption.

I am a proud leftist who cannot understand the support for the man. His death was tragic - no question. However, I still think he would have lost the nomination to Humphrey had he lived and a GOOD thing. RFK has been mythologized to an extreme - unlike anyone else. Yes, even more so than JFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. RFK Was No Cardboard Saint
It's interesting all those examples you cite are before the assasination of JFK which was a life altering event for him.

I'll take a shot at a one and leave the rest to my fellow DUers.


Recent archives have proven that RFK was a moderating influence on Joe McCarthy.

Maybe as a proud "leftist" you don't like RFK because he was never a "leftist" and never aspired to be one.

He was a traditional liberal in the tradition of FDR, Harry Truman, and JFK.

RFK like the traditional liberals who preceded him wanted to make the system better and more equitable. They didn't want to replace it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xequals Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I recently saw an old RFK interview
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 07:33 AM by xequals
conducted by David Frost shortly before RFK's death where he seems to be apologetic about his earlier brash/prosecutorial persona. You're right, he seems to have undergone a change that was due not only to his brother's death, but from the overall turmoil of the '60s, the civil rights movement, MLK's death, the Vietnam War etc.

The main thing the far left still hates about the Kennedy brothers is their staunch opposition to communism.

IMO, they were courageous and heroic to fend off hard left and hard right attacks from WITHIN their own party. The Democratic party of 1960 was very different from what it is today. There were extreme forces on the left (Marxists and other Castro sympathizers) and right (segregationists and the old southern Democrats) ripping the party apart.

JFK and RFK were a tougher breed of liberal than FDR, so was Truman. Remember, FDR had the leeway to do basically do and say whatever he wanted because of the extreme situation -- the great depression, the war, etc. He faced little to no opposition. FDR is the father of the modern Democratic Party, a great liberal, but it's unrealistic for some to think that we will have a Dem President in the near future who is as far to the left on economic issues as FDR was. Also, FDR wasn't even that far to the left considering the situation -- his New Deal economics were designed to save capitalism, not replace it. And future Democrats like JFK, while more moderate on economic issues, were farther to the left on social issues like civil rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I Agree 100%
RFK and JFK were sui generis....

If I tried I couldn't think of one contemporary Dem who is similar to JFK and especially RFK philosophically or tempermentally.


I think Bill Clinton had RFK's ability to empathize but that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
30. Bobby Kennedy All The Way!!!
I've already had the privledge of voting for the honorable Mr. Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. DID Vote for:
HUMPHREY, McGOVERN, MONDALE, DUKAKIS, plus the ones who won (including GORE) and would have voted for any one nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC