Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cable news programs wetting their pants over 30,000 lb. bomb...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 05:47 AM
Original message
Cable news programs wetting their pants over 30,000 lb. bomb...
Flipping through the channels I notice this morning that they're going gaga over the "Massive Ordinance Penetrator."

Rumsfeld, of course, is trotted out to comment on how "so much is going on underground around the globe, especially in terrorist countries." Failing, of course, to name any 'terrorist countries.' Fearr, fear, fear, terra, terra, terra.

Why, the big PR push for this yet to be built 'humanitarian' weapon? Is the Carlyle Group behind this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, it's about underground labs in...
... Iran and North Korea. They want to threaten other countries with nuking (hence the talk about new, small earth-burrowing nukes), but they don't actually have such weapons. So, they are looking for conventional weapons which might do the job.

But, just for speculation's sake, here are some general observations. Even 3-5 kiloton nuclear weapons burrowing underground by a hundred feet send up a big cloud of radioactive dirt (easily detectable by radiological instruments and from seismic information), and we don't have any which can burrow 100 feet underground--much less, in fact.

So, if we use a small nuclear weapon, we'll get caught, and we won't obtain our objective of destroying deeply-buried facilities. So, the arms manufacturers have sold the Pentagon an alternative, which is impressive to the neo-con civilians who know neither math or physics--namely, even bigger conventional weapons, which will throw up a lot of dirt, but at least that dirt won't be radioactive, and therefore traceable....

If the neo-cons use nukes, both US and world opinion will relegate them to the garbage can. They know that. These much bigger conventional weapons proprosed by military contractors are a way of giving the neo-cons what they think they want, without actually accomplishing anything but the transfer of funds from the government to private industry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I Think I Saw That Thing
In a Xandria catalogue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. On CNN
I saw the other Carol on CNN this morning talking about it with a smile on her face like it was some new toy or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just as some men are obsessed about penis sizes
Men's policies are also obsessed about size. Remember "more bang for the bucks" being the operative phrase during the nuclear arms race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Massive Penetrator"
Sounds like a sex toy to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly
The War Whores love it when the new toys inrease the bloodflow to their naughty bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Will it even
be possible to get that thing high enough in the air to drop it effectively? I don't know anything about planes and thrust and things like that, and I can't imagine how they could get that thing off the ground? And physically how big is it? Did they say how muc it cost to make just one? I wonder how many good things they could do with the money. It just seems to me that if all the money spent on killing and bombing was used for good things, humanitarian aid, etc., we would probably much safer. Everyone we helped would be protecting us. No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC