Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS evening news-back from the dark side?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
juslikagrzly Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:12 PM
Original message
CBS evening news-back from the dark side?
I watched...waiting tensely for the Berger "scandal" and Dan didn't mention it. Is this a sign that the media is getting the message that repeating repug talking points may not be actual journalism?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh come on, Rather is fair and if anything he is on
our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Unfortunely this is not true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Explain how my statement is not true, please eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Explain how it is. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well, see, I watch Rather quite often for news
and consider him to be very, very fair. But then again, that is just my opinion. I think it is ok to be critical of Dems. as long as you are telling the truth. I don't find myself catching Rather in many lies or whoring for Bush, but then again, that is just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. If he is fair, why are you saying he is a lefty and on "our side"
Fair is just an unbiased opinion. A reporter who reports all sides fairly with an allegiance to none. But you stated CBS is on "our side".

Why do you state that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. He is a lefty that reports the news fairly.
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 06:41 PM by Bush was AWOL
I'm a lefty and I try to look at things objectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. There are no lefty reporters on TV news
None. If there were then we would have had pre-war TV news shows saying we should not go to war. We would have news shows saying BushCo lies. We would have news shows showing how many people in foreign countries are dieing because Georgie will not fund the AIDS programs he said he is funding.

There are a few reporters who report the fair news in the center, but most of them toe the RW propaganda talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. They fell for the same shit Kerry and Edwards did
Lots of Americans did who now oppose the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. No, they did not. They were told to toe the RW line so they did.
If they were lefty, they would have been reporting the lefty line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Right ,They had a big War-Hardon like the rest of em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. What is this "our side" business?
CBS is a business and will always be on the side of its corporate interest.

When you say "our side" what do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I mean, I think CBS leans left
Republicans hate it and consider Rather to be a very biased lefty. That is just my opinion of course, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Yes, now I understand because you also think Chrissy Matthews
leans left (from a previous thread) and we here know that Chrissy is so far right of center. Faux must be good TV in your opinion.

CBS is in the middle, but the RW thinks that anyone who does not toe the RW propaganda line must be the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Ok. But that is your opinion against mine
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 06:46 PM by Bush was AWOL
Edit: I absolutely do not think for a second that Faux news is ever fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. No, that is not just my opinion
Every single lefty web site and blog also holds that opinion. We all say there are no liberal/progressive news on television. The only liberal news available is through AirAmerica and alternative radio stations. That is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Explain to me how the Republicans get away
with the lie that the media is liberal. You know the old excuse for bad news: "It's the liberal media"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Read David Brock's "Blinded by the Right"
The RW has worked long and hard and put a lot of time and money into acquiring the media. Now, after thirty years, all talk radio (except alternatively funded) is conservative. Rush/Hannity/Faux blare out over and over, liberal media. The RW have RW "think tanks" who have their "intellectuals" go on the radio and television spreading the rumor. The RW owns a good majority of the print media who print the RW propaganda of liberal media.

Anyone who does not toe the RW propaganda line is labeled by them to be "liberal". Not fair, but "liberal".

There is no liberal media, except alternatively funded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad As Hell Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Dan got in trouble
for attending a Democratic fundraiser in Texas a few years back, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yogi Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Rather is....
IMHO the fairest of all the news readers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. CBS has always been the best out there as far....
as American Journalism goes.

Last night they had a fair view of what occured. They made IT clear that this was an ONGOING investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. CBS has been--all things considered--pretty fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juslikagrzly Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree, he's always been the best
but it's been really really hard to watch any network news lately, what with all the crap. He very much restored my view of him tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Kerry interview was decent, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Welcome to DU
Rather was very good last night, imho, on the subject. He reported the story but added that it seemed to be politically motivated. (He put it a bit better than that.) The repugs didn't get any bounce off the CBS reporting, and I'm not surprised he didn't mention it tonight. It must be driving them nuts that they aren't getting the spin they want 24/7 like they used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juslikagrzly Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks
It's been an eye-opening experience to be on DU. But, I'm spending way too much time here :-).

I am so happy that it's not getting the play they obviously hoped for. Maybe there's hope for us yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I am so happy that it's not getting the play they obviously hoped for. May
They have enough things to worry about besides trying to project their mistakes upon others who served this country well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. He disposed of it yesterday. Stressed the political timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. abc mentioned it in world news tonight./.....eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. They mentioned it skeptically last night
it wasn't the top story either. The Iraq death count at 900 was the top story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Look, anyone who doesn't think we have to continually fight ...
.... and call the media back to account is crazy. We have allowed, and yes I am blaming myself too, a RW cabal to control three branches of government, steal an election and start a war on false pretense. Yes, that is my FAULT. I was quiet, I didn't hold the media to account. I didn't hold the democratic party to account. I fell asleep - because we had an excellent, charming, skilled chief executive in Bill Clinton and I thought everything was okay. And I dismissed Rush Limbaugh, and the National Review, and Fox News because "Hey, nobody will be stupid enough to believe them.". Well guess what? If your silent - you lose.

So okay, let's see our wonderful first amendment in action and take it back. Doing so will sometimes let hapless but by no means evil people at CBS and NBC and ABC report facts and truth instead blindly repeating RW spin. So I bless and pray for Michael Moore and for Joe Wilson and for the creator of Outfoxed and for all those good people at mediamatters.org and newshounds.us. Because they are why Dan Rather might be able to slip over from the dark side and give us just a peak at what is really going on ..... And maybe next time, 1000 young men and women won't have to go into the ground before I wake up.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here's something on Dan Rather that people have forgotton.
From his bio: http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/d/da/dan_rather.html

<snip>
Disliked in Nixon White House

During the presidency of Richard Nixon, conservative political figures accused him of being unfair in his coverage. At a Houston, Texas news conference in 1974, Nixon fielded a question from a ABC reporter, but Rather, still CBS's White House correspondent, jumped in: "Thank you, Mr. President. Dan Rather, of CBS News. Mr. President..." The room filled with jeers and applause, prompting Nixon to joke "Are you running for something?" Rather replied "No, sir, Mr. President. Are you?"

CBS apparently considered firing Rather and its news president met with administration official John Ehrlichman to discuss the situation. According to NBC's Tom Brokaw, the network considered hiring him as its White House correspondent to replace Rather. But CBS' plans to do so were scrapped after word was leaked to the press.

Reagan and Bush

In the 1980s, Rather became a hero to many American liberals for his tough, skeptical reporting on the Iran-Contra Affair which led to a famous on-air confrontation he had with then-vice-president George H. W. Bush. The incident is widely believed to have been pivotal in Bush's campaign to win the presidency in the 1988 election. It also marked the beginning of Rather's ratings decline, a slump from which he has never recovered. Bush never forgave him and refused to grant Rather an interview after their initial tangle. His son, George W. Bush has apparently followed suit, and has thus far declined to grant Rather an interview during his presidency.

Soft on Democrats?

Up until the presidency of Bill Clinton, Rather's reputation as a skeptical journalist was unquestioned. That changed during the Clinton years when his critics accused Rather of going easy on the president. During Clinton's impeachment, Rather was a vocal defender of the president and a persistent critic of Kenneth Starr, one of the independent counsels appointed to investigate allegations of corruption within the administration.

Rather's critics gained further ammunition when the CBS anchor was revealed by The Washington Post to have raised money for the Democratic Party of Texas. The incident dogged Rather for weeks and he was asked about it repeatedly by fellow journalists.
<snip>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Probably not a good move for a newsperson but as a Texas
Dem., I like(d) the help. We sure could and can use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monchie Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. I think that last paragraph is a misrepresentation:
"Rather's critics gained further ammunition when the CBS anchor was revealed by The Washington Post to have raised money for the Democratic Party of Texas. The incident dogged Rather for weeks and he was asked about it repeatedly by fellow journalists."

I don't have time to do the research now, but I vaguely remember that the flap was about Rather accompanying his daughter, who was a Democratic Party official, to the fundraiser. I don't recall anything about him actually raising funds.

Interestingly enough, very few eyebrows rose when Brit Hume, who was then ABC's chief White House correspondent, played tennis on several occasions with the man he was supposed to be covering, George H.W. Bush. Excuse me if I'm wrong, but isn't it a breach of journalistic ethics to socialize with the official you're supposed to be covering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I do remember the exchange he and Poppy Bush had on
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 07:02 PM by Cleita
live TV, when Rather asked him if he knew about Iran-Contra beforehand. Poppy turned into the nasty person we knew he was and said he wasn't doing the interview to be asked that question and then abruptly ended the interview. I dropped the soda I was drinking at the time. Dan was in trouble from that day forward.

As far as for the fund raising, if he was a Democrat helping a Democratic candidate on his own time, I really don't know what the conservatives had to flap about except their usual MO of character assassination and getting people fired from their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. Rather is the only one worth a damn
He's not perfect but he's miles beyond the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC