Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WOW Randi and John Dean,:Novak not protected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:00 PM
Original message
WOW Randi and John Dean,:Novak not protected
no more info but stay tuned for annon..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not protected --- ?? What, not protected by being a journalist?
It would be helpful if you actually gave us the whole thought, not some shorthand version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. John Dean, on Randi Rhodes, said that a journalist not covered to
protect source when required to testify before a grand jury. Dean also said that due to the sort of security clearance needed, Ms. Plame's identity as a CIA NOC agent would not be bantered about in memos which just anybody at the WH could read.

Dean said that maybe 6 people in the WH had clearance to know about Plame and it would have been simple for bush* to call those few people in for a chat about the outing. Gee, and the shrub didn't take that simple step, but he is gonna get to the bottom of the whole matter

Ooooo Anonymous is on Randi now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. From what I heard
journalists are not protected about revealing sources from a grand jury, maybe because it's proceedings are supposed to be secret, I am not sure. But Dean said he knows two journalists sitting on supoenas now and one of their wives joked she was baking cookies.

He also said that his good sources told him that someone who used to work with Plame in the CIA is now with the NSC and that may be how her identity got into the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. this about outing Valerie Plame
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. When does the traitor broadcast? I don't like to watch him but today
might be fun. Last time I swallowed a handful of antacids and watched, he was looking pretty bad. Bet he looks worse today.

Poor baby :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course he shouldn't be
he committed a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. As a journalist, he shouldn't be forced to reveal his source.
But if his revelation was against the law, he needs to face the consequences.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. According to John Dean
he's not going to be protected. I don't know what law he was quoting...

Did anyone else here this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. He'll ...SING LIKE A BIRD
I am sure the fuck doesn't have the stomach for some serious jail time. He is probably on the phone already trying to cut a deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. go look at Dean's FindLaw column
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Grand Jury testimony and proceedings are secret and journalists are not
granted the same latitude to protect sources as when they are in public court proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now she's interviewing anonymous
But she asked if she could call him Mike cuz calling him anonymous is weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. This could be why he hasn't been called, he is a subject of the
investigation.

Whether he should be required to reveal his source is an separate issue entirely from whether he was legally allowed to publish classified information after he was told not to publish. The standard making publication illegal would be pretty high since there are all those technicalities in the Constitution about prior restraint. Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That is a pretty big question
Sure he devulged the name....but did he know it was classified information. This too lets Cheney and possibly Bush off the hook for not doing any thing to prevent the name from being released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. and John Dean said
they are sitting on two subpoena's, didn't say who it's for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. By his own admission he knew.
He contacted the CIA and they told him not to go forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. So if Novak was told not to go forward
and the CIA must have alerted the White House of the breech in security. Coupled with the fact the story was held for several months.

Ooooooohhhhhh ......... this list of FELONIES and CONSPIRATORS goes on and and on and on and on

This is like sending a dead fish by snail mail.

When it finally arrives it stinks so bad it clears the whole house out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I would think the identy of a CIA NOC agent would be known to be
classified. If he didn't know that for sure (unlikely) he damned well should have asked! And ignorance of law is no defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Novak lies through his teeth, or more precisely, badly fitting dentures.
God I hate that pompous asshole. He is such a dick. I hope he has to spill his guts and give up the right wing whore that spilled the story. I might even watch him on TV after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Millions of folks feel the same way about Novak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC