Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's billing records/ W's TANG records. Notice different coverage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-04 10:50 PM
Original message
Hillary's billing records/ W's TANG records. Notice different coverage?
We never heard the end of Hillary's billing records.

Where is the same coverage?

W's records show he was AWOL. AWOL. AWOL.

Did anyone miss that? AWOL. Deserter. Coward. Pussy.

Where's the coverage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-04 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah - where is Judicial Watch Larry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. The difference is...(drumroll please)
one person's name is Clinton, the other named Bush.

I always thought the Clinton's played the psuedo-scandals wrong. They should have said about 1) Vince Foster and 2) the billing records-go ahead and investigate the HELL out of it. The RW spin (about the records) was that NO ONE had access to the family quarters-when in fact the Clinton's were loosey-goosey about security. I even heard Linda Tripp's name bandied about by tin-foil hatters because she worked around Vince Foster (and his files) and always was the person closest to whatever mini-drama was erupting that day.

If Foster was indeed "suicided", the evidence points to a conspiracy AGAINST the Clinton's, not BY them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Same thing with the Free Speech Zones (FSZs)
The Republicans have thought this through a while back and want to show old ladies and kids behind wire along with the GOP white guys gnashing their teeth. Since no major media outlet has shown Bush's FSZ it will appear that the Dems are doing this first and worst.

Same thing but different coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC