|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Gothic Sponge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 01:56 PM Original message |
Instead of a Minimum Wage, how about a Maximum Wage in America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mermaid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. 50 million is WAY TOO HIGH!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaTeacher (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I would go for a cap. Although---If our government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Zanti Regent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
87. Why not index the minimum wage to inflation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicvortex20 (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 07:09 AM Response to Reply #87 |
91. Why not just do away with inflation to start with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr.Green93 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. how about a tax on wealth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaTeacher (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. we already do that--but it is not good enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr.Green93 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. wealth is not taxed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
umass1993 (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
83. let wealth determine rate and tax income |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. thats what David McReynolds the socialist candiate in 2000 wanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. 50 mil would not be unreasonable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let's go for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. How in the world would you tax someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terry_M (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Nah, we need to leave people room to grow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftist. (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
48. Agreed on taxing every dollar evenly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. 1 million a year for each individual earner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Wouldn't This Encourage Entrepreneurs To Go Abroad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Yes, any "max wage" cap would create flight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
63. The government can also cap the amount a person takes if they leave... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:27 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. So I can move to Canada, but I can't take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. No... Because If This So Called Cap Existed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicvortex20 (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 07:25 AM Response to Reply #71 |
93. That makes no sense... it doesnt exist and thats why their here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicvortex20 (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 07:27 AM Response to Reply #63 |
94. Almost impossible to prevent people moving money now in this age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 09:39 AM Response to Reply #94 |
98. If it were a crime to move millions offshore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicvortex20 (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #98 |
109. And how would you stop them from moving FROM overseas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. That's where the state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Inequality Is A Fact Of Life... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 05:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
62. Capping income at $50 million would NOT make people equal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 07:30 AM Response to Reply #26 |
95. Economic inequality is a result of man-made laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicvortex20 (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 07:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
92. Absolutely... its the quickest way to turn the US into a 3rd world country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. So Jason Kidd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
50. Yes. It's not that complicated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSandman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Athletes and actors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
37. Here here!....I agree with you. Bush has turned Capitalism to shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. How about tying maximum and minimum wage together? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Si if the peanut vendor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. So what's your solution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I offered my ideas in post 16 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 04:34 AM Response to Reply #23 |
90. Somehow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 01:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
103. The peanut vendor is a bad example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mermaid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
39. I Like This Idea!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. The custodians at Exxon will like it too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. no thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No one does, nor are they willing to pay what's necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. nah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
53. It's not subjective actually. Equality is just, it is not up for debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:56 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. we're not talking about equality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. No one willing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. "...if you're not rich." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. If you define rich as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #27 |
54. I am willing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowjacket (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:50 PM Response to Reply #54 |
68. You don't have to wait for the government to legislate it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:55 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Charity I do. But overpaying the government I won't yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowjacket (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. I had a professor in college who would agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 09:38 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. That's what the House of Representatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. Wrong way to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Only if the stockholders are the employees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. The stockholders are not the employees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
57. Then what incentive does it have to provide *anything* for employees? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
66. Depends on who the employee is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ldf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
59. "stockholders are owners of the company" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Wally (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:16 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. You know........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kanary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. Or....... we could have BOTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightOwwl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
19. No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. No, just a better minimum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
25. The maximum CEO wage should be limited to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:41 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. No you wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
morgan2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
28. what seems more realistic and possible to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Companies would just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
29. I would never want to limit $ and individual could make from inventiveness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
36. Actually, I would like to see half of the profits of a company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Would you also agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. It's a one way street and I'm not against it, considering that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUSTANG_2004 (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 08:30 AM Response to Reply #36 |
97. Suspicious statistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
38. If the repukes truly do care about life, they CANNOT say 'no' to this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zidane (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
42. Living wage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oscar111 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. 110 % tax- where? + define confiscatory,pet term of neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oscar111 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Hi cap = greater ability to bribe an end of all caps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oscar111 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. 103 Trillion is total wealth. FRB says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
47. Germany has such a thing.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kellanved (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. no, it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 05:21 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. I swear that's what a German law student told me.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kellanved (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. that is very strange indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moonbeam_Starlight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
56. How about five million as a cap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
67. 50 million a year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Atheletes And Entertainers Get Big Bucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thinkingwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
72. oh for crying out loud! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 07:12 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Use The Taxes From Capitalism To Bolster The Welfare State.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fescue4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
75. If one is capable of making $50 mil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
76. Horrible idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
77. We ran something like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
79. So who gets to set the upper limit....you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
umass1993 (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #79 |
86. who sets the lower limit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
80. Couldn't that be seen as oppression? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:07 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Isn't the current Economic Inequity Oppression? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
81. The truly avaricious would be appalled by this. But seeing how 98% live... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
umass1993 (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
umass1993 (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
85. I still think basing income tax on wealth is better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
88. Unenforceable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-25-04 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
89. Very, very Intriguing idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Wally (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 07:55 AM Response to Reply #89 |
96. And what should the cap be???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SarahB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
99. Reform for corporate taxation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kanary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
100. Here's a good resource for rethinking our society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
101. Absolutely not. This is a capitalist society. If someone invents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TXlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
102. This topic is all about the politics of envy and greed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 01:38 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. I'll buy them plane tickets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TXlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 04:01 PM Response to Reply #104 |
106. expropriation of legally-earned assets is not anti-capitalistic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 04:41 PM Response to Reply #102 |
107. Greed? Wouldn't that describe those that oppose it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eagle_Eye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
105. Want to earn more than the MAX salary cap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaTeacher (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-26-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Now that is good thinking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC