blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:38 PM
Original message |
Any press nailing Bush's WH coverup of his AWOL days? |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-26-04 02:40 PM by blm
If the DC saying is true, that the coverup is worse than the crime, then why isn't the press nailing Bush and his WH toadies who all lined up and claimed he served honorably, did his time and even put forward some lying slob who claimed he worked with Bush in Alabama?
The WH finally admitted he didn't show up, yet the press is going to let the FOUR YEARS of the coverup, the misleading press statements, the outright lies go unquestioned?
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Anyone remember Scotty McClellan using that guy to claim he served with W? |
|
Imagine if ANY Dem tried that one.
What was that guy's name anyway, and who told him to say he served with W?
|
NeonLX
(472 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
For one thing, it would make them look bad. For another, they no longer care about "investigative journalism", unless it's to investigate the sex lives of Democratic officials...
|
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The Imperial Pravda can NEVER oppose the Imperial Family |
|
They would be punished. Severely but not (yet) murderously.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message |