An argument Dems can make re: Bush lies

[dennis4868]

Why doesn't a Dem tell a media whore when he is told that Bush did not lie but was misled by the CIA that Bush, in the run up to the war, said the following statements (all of which is not supported by any National Intelligence Report or any other intelligence agency):

1. Massive stockpile of biological weapons

2. Nuclear weapons program and could have a nuclear wepon any day

3. Unmanned aerial vehicle that can carry WMD to the USA

4. Saddam/911/al qaeda connection

5. Saddam wants to give his WMD to terrorist

6. Saddam will use his WMD against the USA

If none of this was supported by the CIA or any other intelligence agency then how can a media whore/repub say that Bush was misinformed by the CIA?

Why can't a dem stand up and say this and put to rest this myth that Bush did not lie and was instead misled by the CIA?