PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:15 PM
Original message |
I just watched Ronald Reagan at the Democratic Convention on FOX "News"... |
|
Channel!!!
I LOVED IT!!!
:kick:
|
Melodybe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well what did they say? |
AntiCoup2K4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. So are the FAUX heads freaking out over the son of their "God" ...... |
|
...."betraying" his father? :eyes:
|
NightOwwl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
just called his speech disgusting and said he's trading on his father's name. Fuck you Bill.
|
Fenris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. As opposed to Bill Kristol HOW? |
BayouBengal07
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I was just about to post that. Bill Kristol is such a douche bag. At least he's toned down his war drums.
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Trading on his father's name? |
|
Now what fetid Chimp does that remind me of?
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Cheney off, Mr. Kristol. Tell me, sir, what have you ever done in your life to merit your current overinflated position?
|
kodi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. gee kristol should reserve that remark for his hero bush |
SayitAintSo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Don't you love it when they get MAD ? |
|
You know they are really worried .... Kind of like the Grinch when all the Whos in Who-ville get happy .... They just can't stand it ! Makes them meaner than ever.
|
NightOwwl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The FAUXers are trying to convince us |
|
that stem cell research = killing babies.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Will Michael Reagan speak at the RNC? |
|
I hope so, because he's a blubbering idiot and the difference between the two will be striking.
|
Doosh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Michael Reagan was blubbering about how Ron Jr. was Nancy's favorite |
playahata1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. MICHAEL -- Nancy is NOT your Moms! Get over it! |
|
Michael probably started doing RW media hoping it would win him some approval from Ronnie. He has never gotten over the fact that he is an adopted child and that Ronnie and Jane did not have as solid a relationship with him as they should have.
On the other hand, Patti (even with all her drama) and Ron Junior, are RIGHTEOUS. And Maureen seemed to be an okay person.
|
blueblitzkrieg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
sounds like a child.
"He was always mom's favorite!"
Boo-freakin'-hoo.
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Nancy isn't even his mother so i don't know why he is crying about it |
|
his mother is jane wyman, reagan's first wife. they adopted him. it's not nancy's job to be his mother. blame his real mother, jane wyman if he isn't getting any love from a mother.
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. i guess Jane Wyman didn't love Michael as Nancy loves Ron Jr. |
|
dumb ass needs to get over it. nancy is NOT his mother. his mother is jane wyman . if he is lacking motherly love it has nothing to do with nancy. and good for nancy for loving her son ron jr.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |