INDEPTH: POETRY IN POLITICS
John Kerry's poetic gamble
Dan Brown, CBC News Online | July 26, 2004
John Kerry has been quoting the poetry of Langston Hughes on the campaign trail. No matter which candidate wins this November's presidential vote, 2004 will go down in U.S. history as a remarkable election year. That's because John Kerry, the Democratic White House hopeful, has been reciting poetry as part of his stump speech. And that kind of thing doesn't happen often in America.
Although there isn't a strict separation between the worlds of presidential politics and poetry, they don't collide with great frequency these days. And Kerry's use of Let America Be America Again, a poem written by the late Langston Hughes, represents a head-on collision– not only has the Massachusetts senator adopted the title of the poem as his official slogan, but he is also quoting entire lines from Hughes on the campaign trail.
<snip>
President George W. Bush has made a name for himself as almost an anti-poet. Which brings up the obvious question for political junkies: Is Kerry using the poem as a method, albeit a subtle one, to create a contrast with President George W. Bush? After all, Bush has made a name for himself as someone who sees the world clearly and speaks plainly, as almost an anti-poet. He does not make conscious attempts to impress voters with verbose speechifying, and can sometimes come across as tongue-tied. Did Kerry pick Hughes so that Democrats can say of their candidate "See, here's an articulate man, a man who's at ease dealing with complex ideas and making nuanced distinctions?"
<snip>
The poem's title does not, however, resonate with James Taranto. Taranto is the editor of Opinion Journal, the online arm of the Wall Street Journal's editorial page. He has written about Hughes several times since Kerry started quoting the poet, and it's his judgment that Let America Be American Again is, in fact, anti-American. "So America isn't America under the Bush administration? I guess that's the implication," Taranto says.
Taranto believes the poem was "clearly inspired by if not communism, a naïve sympathy for communism" that was fashionable at the time Hughes wrote. Kerry is familiar enough with Hughes that he was asked to write the introduction to a new collection of the writer's work, so Taranto can't imagine Kerry was unaware of the poem's communist subtext.
<snip>
yes, James, that would be the goddamn implication about the unAmerican Bush junta! http://www.cbc.ca/arts/features/poetryinpolitics/