Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

okay...I want to know...are ALL congressional seats up for re-election???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:24 AM
Original message
okay...I want to know...are ALL congressional seats up for re-election???
I thought they were staggered like the senate.

It is late and I am tired. Give me some luv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carrion Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes
All 435 Representatives are technically up for re-election. Of course, no more than 30 will probably be truly competitive.

33 or 34 Senate seats are up for grabs. They are staggered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. wow, for some reason, I thought
that congress was staggered as well.

I knew the senate was


I never realized the house was



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. How would it be staggered?
Elections every year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Members of the House serve 2 year terms
Compared to 6 year terms for Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Every blessed one every two years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. From the "Horses Mouth"
Article I

Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. they (we?) should really do something about those 2-year terms . . .
as soon as a Congresscritter gets into office, s/he has to begin raising funds for re-election (and to pay off whatever campaign debts they may still have) . . . doesn't leave much time or psychic space for the more mundane things like, say, legislating . . . leads to things like the Patriot Act which, I would wager, not a single Member read before voting on it . . . they should have at least four-year terms . . . we could stagger them, electing half the House every two years . . . at least they'd have SOME time for actual work . . .

or, we could move to public financing of federal elections . . . take the money out of politics, and we'll very likely have better government . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. We should expand the size of the House so it is more representative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I do think NH has a larger number.
When I lived in that state the joke was you had a state rep. on every corner.They also got very little pay. I think we should run some for the House that would cut pay since they all seem to leave the place with millions.Need more people to run and clean up all this mess. So much money in Congress they can not help them selfs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. 'State rep' means the state legislature. I'm talking about the
House of Representatives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's all in the US constitution...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah, Duh, and in the constitution New Hampshire doesn't get extra
why don't you try reading the posts you respond to?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Sorry you got up from the wrong side of the bed honey....
but a lot of these type questions are answered easily by reading the US Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Despite your misreading of my posts
I know the constitution very well. And the post I was responding to, that said


I do think NH has a larger number.

When I lived in that state the joke was you had a state rep. on every corner.They also got very little pay. I think we should run some for the House that would cut pay since they all seem to leave the place with millions.Need more people to run and clean up all this mess. So much money in Congress they can not help them selfs.


is clearly confusing state representatives with the US House of Representatives.

U.S. Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Constitutionally, the entire Congress is up for grabs every 2 years
In actual practice, maybe 10% of the seats are actually competitive.

Even less are projected to be competitive this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes, but Extreme Gerrymandering, pioneered by the Busheviks
Edited on Thu Jul-29-04 12:36 PM by tom_paine
has rendered most seat as safe as being Stalin's Pal on the Soviet Duma in 1938.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC