KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 06:56 PM
Original message |
Hey! Did You Know Wes Clark COULD Be Sec. of Defense, There's Precedent... |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-29-04 07:33 PM by cryingshame
George Marshall was Sec. of Defense with less than 10 years out of military... He was given a waiver.Pertinent info in bold towards the end. I included the other info for background:
Given the controversy surrounding Johnson's performance, and especially the military situation in Korea, President Truman recognized the need to choose a person of great national prestige to head the Department of Defense. His selection of General Marshall eminently met this requirement. ....
snip
In 1939 just as World War II began in Europe, President Roosevelt appointed Marshall Army chief of staff. In that position and as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff beginning in 1942, Marshall labored unceasingly to build up U.S. defenses and to prepare the Army for action. President Truman later described him as the "architect of victory" in World War II.
Within weeks after Marshall retired from the Army in November 1945 Truman sent him to China in an unsuccessful attempt to mediate the civil war between the Nationalists and Communists and to establish a coalition government. He returned to the United States in January 1947 to become secretary of state for a momentous two years, marked by the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance, and negotiation of the NATO pact. After he left the State Department he achieved further distinction as president of the American Red Cross.
Marshall's appointment as secretary of defense required a special congressional waiver because the National Security Act prohibited a commissioned military officer on active duty within the previous 10 years from holding the post. Although the Senate approved quickly, questions did surface about a military leader holding a position clearly intended for a civilian. With the Johnson-Acheson competition in mind, some senators queried Marshall about his views on State-Defense relationships and service unification. Marshall noted that he had "suffered from the lack of unification throughout the war" and also that he had initiated several Army unification studies during the war period.
|
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
precisely-that's what he said while talking to Anderson Cooper :D
|
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Shouldn't he have said 20:11? |
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. What are you talking about? |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-29-04 07:25 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
The bolded quote that you provided says absolutely nothing about the precedent you claim. Why didn't you provide its context?
George Marshall was Secretary of State, I know that. Was he ever Secretary of Defense? Within ten years of being on active duty? Your citation doesn't say that he was.
What is the source of your citation?
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Here's The Link-Marshall Was Sec. of DEFENSE |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-29-04 07:32 PM by cryingshame
read the bolded part.
www.defenselink.mil/specials/ secdef_histories/bios/marshall.htm
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. OK, now it makes sense, thank you. |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Would a repug Senate do that? |
|
Give a special congressional waiver to Wes? If we don't win the House and Senate back....that may be questionable. :( They ARE bastards, you know. :)
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-29-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Dunno Incognito... But We Could Make Em Look Like Treasonous, Unpatriotic |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message |