ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-21-03 07:36 PM
Original message |
Why I think Wesley Clark would probably be the best person to replace Bush |
|
While I am inclined to pick Edwards followed by Dean amongst the current Democrats I also recognize the potential for a Clark candidacy. He would effectively remove any slimmer of strength Bush has with national and homeland security. He has little or no baggage the Bush cartel could use against him. He was against invading Iraq. He has also shown himself to be very socially liberal. He was the Supreme Nato Commander. He was a Rhodes scholar. Heck, the guy is even from Arkansas! Did I mention successful businessman? Well spoken?
He very well could end up being the Democratic Eisenhower. If he does it right and hires a top-notch campaign staff.
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-21-03 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 07:43 PM by RobertSeattle
The Democrats have got to get the "Weak on Military" monkey (even if a bogus charge) off our backs or we'll be the minority party for the next decade. Clark can make it happen in an instant. Clark is Rove's worst nightmare. He'll make Bush look like a punk.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-21-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Another reason why I support Clark other than that I think he could.. |
|
deliver a sweeping, tamper-proof victory. I think he can deliver coattails for congressional dems. When Clark gets finished presenting his case for ousting bush, the repukes will go down with him as they are all in it.
Also, I think that he will see to it that bushco pay for their treason against our country. I think he will do the right thing in all aspects.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |