Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Maher's Show The First Shot In A New Democratic Vigor?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:14 PM
Original message
Was Maher's Show The First Shot In A New Democratic Vigor?
The was the first television broadcast I have seen where Democrats were standing up with conviction and calling the Republican farce of a Government exactly what it is and doing the same for W.

Did the convention give new vigor to Democrats, have we finally got a heart and a voice? After almost 4 years of ovine behavior there is a strength to the party today that was not here last week.

When Michael Moore said he wasn't going to take it any more, he was going to speak up, he meant it. Thank goodness for a party that is finally getting its feet, its legs, and its voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I dont think so....
Michael Moore has never been afraid to speak up and fight back....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. None of them are Democrats.
There were a couple ABB though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I love how we gathered those people into our circle of
Friends!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Exactly - that's how we are going to win
because there are millions of people who never bothered to get involved in politics before who are suddenly energized to vote - even to volunteer and donate. The current situation is so bad that people feel they have to make a change. And they can make that change this year by voting Democratic, and more than that, they can discover that they really do have a voice, they can help determine their own destiny.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maher is a registered independent, but he tends to be liberal
in a lot of his thinking. He's always been outspoken about what he believes, like Jon Stewart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Maher supported Nader 4 years ago.
I also recall him saying that the 2000 election was the least important in ages -- that everything was going so well in this country that no one could screw it up.   I guess he's reconsidered that position. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. True and so did Michael Moore.
I don't know if you saw his show yesterday but both he and Michael Moore dressed Nader down and made a joke about both of them getting on their knees and begging him not to run. These are two votes Nader can't count on this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. More libertarian
He isn't too wild about liberals who want to butt into everybody's business and try to create utopia. Didn't you hear him agree with Owens that liberals had caused alot of their own problems? But he has always been outspoken, I agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. That he was.
But if you have been following him since then he has been turning left more and more. Also, no one today can claim that liberals are butting into everyone's business more than the present fascists in situ.

That argument about government in your business is another Republican lie that everyone up until now believed. Also, the tax and spend Democrats is another one. We have so much evidence to the contrary these days that anyone who still believes those RW mantras has entered the abyss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. We all have to do
whatever it is that we must to get GWB out of the WH. No excuses.
I personally wanted someone, anyone to ask why Bush just sat in the classroom for 7 minutes and then posed with the kiddies for the photo op that took another 20 minutes. Did those people jumping, melting or being crushed to their death matter to you at all? You sat there. You ordered nothing. You asked no questions. The only time in your presidency when you had to become the president you couldn't.

I am pleased Maher is asking about this because no matter what republicans do they can't defend it. Oh sure they will all walk lock step with some BS but that is also their undoing. The majority of Americans see it for what it is. Non action.

No president should have responded this way. None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ms. Campbell was trying to make a very important
point and that was that the American people did not see Bush sitting on his thumbs on 9/11. That is very important because it proves that the media is in Bush's hands and will show or not show whatever he wants. None of the Americans on the panel wanted to pursue that issue and she tried twice and got nowhere. After seeing Fahrenheit 911, I emailed all of the major networks and told them they should be ashamed for not showing me what Michael Moore showed me in a movie. I didn't get even one response. They really don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Imagine if that 7-minute video had been played ad infinitum
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 01:31 AM by stopbush
for the few weeks after 9/11. Imagine if it got half the play the Dean Scream got in 2004! Would the country have "rallied behind bush?" I don't think so. They would have put two and two together. Rather than our self-declared war pretzledent hero, the country would have seen a deer in the headlights who had his guard down and didn't defend us. Hell, he might have been impeached or forced to resign before the year (2001) was out!

The pity is that many people here at DU knew about that 7-minutes of indecision from the get-go. It was the media that covered bush's ass...and they continue to cover his ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. David Drier got the shit kicked out of him. He took off before the
handshakes at the end.

Unfortunately, guys like Maher and Moore don't have enough facts on hand to dispute the typical talking points. Drier brought up the $87 billion *flip-flop.* I WISH Moore has said, "yeah, Kerry voted against the republican version that had inserted ANOTHER tax cut for the rich people. And bush threatened to veto the Kerry version of that bill that was exactly like the one that passed, just minus the tax cut for the millionaires. Kerry said help the soldiers, but let's pay for it by taking back $5000 from everybody making over $200k. bush said, I'll give the soldiers their money, but only if everyone making over $200k gets another $5000 in their pockets in tax cuts."

That's the truth of the matter and the best way to stop the $87 billion myth in its tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Bill did try to interject the point
that the bill was changed, Drier however did the usual Repuke (ala Sean Hannity) diversion of constantly talking as the other person attempts to make their point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I missed that...probably because Drier was talking over Maher.
BTW - didn't Mike look totally pissed at Nader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. He was totally giving Nader the evil eye.
I told my husband Moore was looking at Nadar with an expression very close to hate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I don't blame him. Nader called him a "beach ball" and pretended
that he was genuinely concerned for his health. Not to mention the rest of the passive-aggressive whining in that letter. Schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. It wasn't impressive
The problem is that people like them are just as cynical about Democrats so they don't bother to find out, or believe, anything a Democrat has to say anyway. So it's difficult for them to defend Democratic votes, even when they deserve to be defended. "Bush threatened to veto the bill and not support the troops if there was a tax measure to pay for it", is more damaging than what they're saying about Kerry. But we can't get our people, including the campaign, to think and turn the damn thing around on Bush. It's very annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. For someone like Drier with a voting record
I think the best thing prior to the program would be to find a vote he made that could be cast in a similarly unflatering light, to show what a bogus attack it really is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Remember Moore
was a big time Nader supporter in 2000,Maher is voting for Kerry and even Don Imus and Barnicle are"in the tank"for John Kerry to use Imus' vernacular
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Maher voted for Nader in 2000 also.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Barnicle?
Really? I hadn't heard, did he say that on Imus or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Barnicle, Dan Shaughnessy and Bob Lobel All On Board
I listened to Barnicle on his Boston area Friday radio show (96.9)

Dan is a sportswriter for the Globe (covers Sox), Lobel is weather director on one of the local TV stations.

The three of them were giddy, downright giddy.

Lobel seems very onboard - he referred to Fox News by spelling it - you know F-A-U-X...

Barnicle is saying you know, this guy we know, that we've know for years, decades, is going to do it.

Lobel said - okay, can I just say, John Kerry is going to be the next President of the United States. I just have to say that.

They related stories about Kerry, that they guy who spoke at the convention was the guy they knew, of Kerry joking with them, and Barnicle even talked about going to John and Teresa's wedding.

It was a wonderful display of positive enthusiasm by three guys who have a reputation for being a bit cynical.

They are very much on board. I hope Barnicle shows up subbing for Chris Matthews a few times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. I guess you never heard of Howard Dean?
Your very question is an insult, frankly. Dean was even introduced at the convention as the guy who "energized" the party.

Further, Maher isn't a Democrat. He's a left-leaning Libertarian.

That said, yes, there does seem to be a somewhat invigorated party, but Howard Dean WAS the one who got that ball rolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC