Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can the Corporate Propaganda Machine (the Media) be fixed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 08:48 AM
Original message
Can the Corporate Propaganda Machine (the Media) be fixed?
They really have gotten out of control. There is no balance. they are doing the bidding of their Corporate masters and it's starting to make me sick.

The only thing I've seen on Berger's exoneration was on p. 17 of the WSJ. It was all we heard about for three days, and as many of us suspected it was a total non-story.

I don't know how we reign them in though. While consolidation is a problem that can be fixed through legislation the issue is deeper than that. And to boycott only doesn't help them change their ways, and the people who suck it in will still be duped.

Maybe we need to confront ther sponsors with info from places like Media matters and let them know we will withhold using their products until they demand more factual reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sure, they just need two things
First, enforce antitrust laws and bust up all the monopolies, especially television and newspaper monopolies.

Second, reinstitute the fairness doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. How do you bust up newspaper monopolies
Without infinging on freedom of the press?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Because they sre infringing on us
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 09:55 AM by StClone
When monopolies overtake your freedom to be heard your 1st Amendment rights have been abridged.

Also the Corporation should not have equal or superior entity status over a private citizen. Most media is a corporately owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Not mine
There are tons of print news media. No matter how many the major media create or buy, it is easy to start more.

Isn't the corporation a collection of individuals? Doesn't it represent their rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Individually
Each person has the individual speech rights. A corporation is given secondary power to owner citizens through an act incorporation laws. So they have amplified voices. Does that seem in the spirit of Free Speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. They speak as a collective
Just as a union, an association, a federation, a church or other collective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Those entities
Are individuals whose concern bring them together as a unified collection of voices whose purposes is to be heard for non-constitutionally guaranteed work or constitutionally guaranteed Religious freedom, not as a going business whose sole enterprise is to sell news, formulate opinion and fact for profit. If the media monopoly is the latter it is enough different in my opinion to negate a comparison with those.

Secondly, monopoly implies more than just a group brought together for common interests but an effort to control all outlets for profit (and possibly manipulation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. For one poster here, everything is perfect already...
Doesn't that imply status quo - ie Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. I'm with you. It's a conflict of interest for corporations that do
business (especially those that profit from defense) with the government to own major media outlets. I am outraged that this even happened in the 1st place. How did we allow major corporations buy the major networks? We trusted that they would do the right thing? Haha shows how naive or blindly this country allows itself to operate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. David Brock who helped the RW set up this RW media
has now joined the fight against it. Please read his letter and join in on the discussion group and media watch:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200407200001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks -- I'm feeling completely powerless... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me too. We have to hit the pavement. Use the internet. Talk to people.
do gatherings at our homes. The media for this election is a net negative for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Here is another media activist movement
The fight for better election coverage has just begun. Join Media For Democracy to pressure mainstream media to improve their coverage of the issues that matter most to Americans in 2004. This initiative mobilizes a growing base of concerned citizens by (1) alerting them to media election coverage mistakes as they occur and (2) providing them with the means to put news executives on notice. By signing up here you join Americans across the political spectrum who stand together in the fight for election coverage that is more diverse, accountable and democratic.

Join the movement:
http://www.mediafordemocracy.us/mfd/join.tcl

or just look at the site first:
http://www.mediafordemocracy.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Thanks Robbien
Talk is cheap and we need to get involved. This is exactly why I started the thread...to see what ideas people have to effect change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. This Berger story is really an example of their bias. I watch the news
and listen carefully. Every story has some negative thing no matter what it is re: Kerry. Example this AM on KDKA talk radio the talk show guy asked a reporter who had been in Boston at the convention about the event and after talking about the mechanics of the convention said "Lets move to Kerry. Of course the buzz is why he was sweating so much" The reporter explained how hot the Fleet Center was and all the bright lights by all the TV cameras, etc. They talked about content and the reporter said everyone up there thought Kerry nailed it and "hit a home run". The slime did not want to hear that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Fiscal Independence will be key...
When news divisions were run as a public service of TV networks that, in turn, were making money hand-over-fist with entertainment programming, the news was MUCH more fair.

When NPR was funded by public contributions and government grants, it was much more fair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Given where we are, how do we
get it back under control? The television news depts were moved into the entertainment divisions and are all about ratings. I know how to search out what's going on, but the problem lies in the fact that most Americans get thier news from TV soundbites, which are really nothing but RW propaganda today.

It's not enough for a few us to be informed if a majority of the population is being spoonfed lies.

Maybe the fairness doctrine is key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not under shrub and the current FCC
The corporations will not do this on their own, and we need a groudswell of the public to rise up and demand change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You know, Michael Moore is thinking about a movie...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. In a word: "No"
I've thought about this quite often since Debacle2000: Can Media News "repent" by seeing the error of their ways and return to the days of Edward R. Morrow and Walter Cronkite? I don't think so.

News, or rather the manipulation of news, has become a tool for neoCons to promote an emerging fascist society. To paraphrase Marx, "the media are the opiate of the people." News has also become entertainment, and as such, needs to appeal to the least common denominator. To achieve this, media news has descended to a level of "cupie doll" journalism. I don't think they'll ever wise up to their folly as long as the bottom line comes first.

Besides, we now have the Internet, so those of us who really want the news can go online to get it without having to endure "happy talk," the "if it bleeds it leads" mentality, and the attention given to the unimportant and insignificant.

Think about it; we have the Constitution protecting free speech, yet Media Whores are enabling a neoFascist government to lie and distort in an attempt to advance the agenda of a few wealthy individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Keith Olbermann covered this story last night too
He also really lampooned the "Al Quaeda" arrest in Pakistan and had the author of the New Republic article on the "July Surprise" on to point out that it was dead on the money about the capture. But other than that, nada on the Berger story. My local paper even had another cartoon today on the editorial page depicting Berger carrying away documents all over his body. Shameful what passes for journalism in this country these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. no shit
i say we fix i t by putting dean in the FCC and then we would have 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. it would help for berger to go to all media
that reported his misdeeds and say now put me on and exonerate me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. But that's not entertainment!
But it might be time to write the mfers a letter or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC