Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone access and copy LTTE from Charlotte Observer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:26 AM
Original message
Can someone access and copy LTTE from Charlotte Observer
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 11:28 AM by blm
I am having trouble getting in and I hear there are several letters on the opinion page of today's paper that are very tough for Bush and the Republicans.

Would appreciate if someone can copy and post them for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Literate Tar Heel Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. sure ... looking now ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks.
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 11:34 AM by blm
You can post them in their own thread if they're as good as I hear.

One that I heard paraphrased was about Clinton's 96 speech and the warning about terrorism. And another about Bush going AWOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Literate Tar Heel Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. here are all the ones relating to the presidential election
pretty mixed ... a few idiots in here


Without war experience, what's left of Kerry?


Vietnam has become the Democratic Party's war of convenient reference. John Kerry's tour of duty is continually referred to as an example of his leadership. By contrast, any left-wing concern 12 years ago over Bill Clinton's leadership abilities after having dodged Vietnam was curiously absent. The real reason John Kerry and Vietnam have become synonymous in this campaign is that if the notion of Kerry as a war veteran is removed and discarded (like his medals), there's not much left to talk about.Kevin Haskell


Charlotte
---------------

Kerry's speech makes me feel hopeful, proud

Before John Kerry's acceptance speech, I was casting my vote against George W. Bush. However, now I am whole-heartedly voting for Kerry. He presents himself with so much grace, wisdom, intelligence, thoughtfulness, style, integrity and credibility. He made me feel hopeful for a better America and proud of our flag again.

Tanja Franke


Charlotte
----------------

Military doesn't need this kind of leadership

John Edwards tells us, "We will strengthen and modernize our military. ... We will tell al-Qaida, `We will destroy you.' " And he and John Kerry, who worked tirelessly to help us lose in Vietnam, are going to make it happen.Right. Do I hear Jane Fonda as secretary of state?

Bill Cunningham


Charlotte
------------------

Meanwhile, on another channel ...

While trying to avoid the broadcast of the Democratic Convention, I happened upon the C-SPAN 2 rebroadcast of Bill Clinton's address to the 1996 convention. In that address, Clinton said terrorism was the major threat to the United States and he was pleading with the Republican Congress to enact legislation to safeguard the country.

That legislation included many of the recommendations of the current 9-11 Commission. Instead, they and the FBI chose to investigate Clinton and ignore the proposed legislation. I guess they thought he was a bigger threat.

Reggie Stearns


Weddington
----------------

Bush, aides cover up sorry service record

Payroll records show Bush did not serve his required time at the National Guard during wartime and that for the last four years the people around him have been providing misleading explanations to those who raised questions. Any other candidate would have been relentlessly excoriated for lying to the press and public on something so relevant to character as wartime service.President Bush has known for over three decades that he was grounded from flying for refusing a medical exam that included drug testing and that he didn't show up for service at the base in Alabama when he was scheduled to do so. All the odd losses of documents that his aides have claimed cannot cover for what Bush knew and when he knew it.

It's one thing to make a mistake as a young man fearful of going to war. It's another for a president and his aides to continue a cover up of that mistake.

Linda Archer


Charlotte
--------------

Democrat mess? Quick! Blame right-wingers!

On the day that the news broke of what Sandy Berger had done, a friend said, "I wonder how long it will take the Democrats to start blaming it on a great right-wing conspiracy?" Judging by two June 27 Forum letters ("There's GOP slime in that well-timed leak" and "When the dust settles, truth will emerge"), it didn't take long at all.

Ann P. Mahoney


Charlotte
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. Very much like I heard it. The one about Clinton's speech in 96
sounds like it was by a Republican who just realized that his party was more serious about investigating Clinton's sex life than acting with Clinton against terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That was an excellent '96 speech.
Republicans should read it, then kick their congressional leadership in the . . . pants.

----------------


The Big Dog, 1996 Dem convention, excerpt:


In the last four years, we have frozen North Korea's nuclear weapons program, and I'm proud to say that tonight there is not a single Russian nuclear missile pointed at an American child.

Now we must enforce and ratify, without delay, measures that further reduce nuclear arsenals, banish poison gas, and ban nuclear tests once and for all.

We have made investments, new investments, in our most important defense asset, our magnificent men and women in uniform. By the year 2000, we also will have increased funding to modernize our weapons systems by 40 percent. These commitments will make sure that our military remains the best-trained, best-equipped fighting force in the entire world. We are developing a sensible nation missile defense, but we must not, not now, not by the year 2000, squander $60 billion on an unproved, ineffective "Star Wars" program that could be obsolete tomorrow.

We are fighting terrorism on all fronts with a three-prong strategy.

First, we are working to rally a world coalition with zero tolerance for terrorism. Just this month I signed a law imposing harsh sanctions on foreign companies that invest in key sectors of the Iranian and Libyan economies. As long as Iran trains, supports, and protects terrorists, as long as Libya refuses to give up the people who blew up Pan Am 103, they will pay a price from the United States.

Second, we must give law enforcement the tools they need to take the fight to terrorists.

We need new laws to crack down on money laundering and to prosecute and punish those who commit violent acts against American citizens abroad; to add chemical markers or taggants to gunpowder used in bombs so we can track the bomb-makers; to extend the same power police now have against organized crime to save lives by tapping all the phones that terrorists use. Terrorists are as big a threat to our future, perhaps bigger, than organized crime. Why should we have two different standards for a common threat to the safety of America and our children?

We need, in short, the laws that Congress refused to pass. And I ask them again: Please, as an American, not a partisan matter, pass these laws now.

Third, we will improve airport and air travel security. I have asked the Vice President to establish a commission and report back to me on ways to do this, but now we will install the most sophisticated bomb detection equipment in all our major airports, we will search every airplane flying to or from America from another nation --every flight, every cargo hold, every cabin, every time.

My fellow Democrats and my fellow Americans, I know that in most election seasons foreign policy is not a matter of great interest in the debates in the barber shops and the cafes of America, on the floors and at the bowling alleys, but there are times when only America can make the difference between war and peace, between freedom and repression, between life death.

We cannot save all the world's children, but we can save many of them.

We cannot become the world's policeman, but where our values and our interests are at stake and where we can make a difference, we must act and we must lead. That is our job, and we are better, stronger and safer because we are doing it.


Full text:
http://www.geocities.com/rickmatlick/nomaclinton96.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It really makes the Republicans TRAITORS in my book.
Esoecially the ones on the Intelligence Committees who chose to go after Clinton instead of helping him with antiterror measures.

And shame on those Republican voters who hungered for the articles decrying Clinton while skipping over the information about terrorism and its growing menace. They really are BAD Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. do you know who was on that committee?
That is sick, you got that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. i don't know.
I have such little time to research, post and read the past months. I feel like I have a half year of catching up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Anybody that lives where this paper is published. GREAT OPPORTUNITY
to respond to the BERGER ACCUSSATIONS. IT WAS A GREAT RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Great place for LTTE because Charlotte is usually a GOP stronghold.
If we can turn this county by just a few percentage points we can take NC in November.

If anyone has any relatives in the area please get them to write the op ed page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC