southernleftylady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 10:36 AM
Original message |
Do you think that all these NYC "scares" are being said to stop protest? |
|
We know that there are going to be HUGE protest in NYC right? Well all these new terror alerts to NYC a way for the government to ban protest?
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I think it is to detract from the momentum of the Democratic convention
This will be all blown over by the time the republican convention arrives
|
soupkitchen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
2. When I read your banner, I thought you meant to discourage protests |
|
And I thought no way that's going to work. But I realized you meant that the government will use this as a rationale to ban protesting. Very interesting. Very plausible.
|
wolfgirl
(950 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a way to accomplish many things. 1. Detract from DNC Convention; 2. Show Bush & Co as "being on the job" to protect all of us; 3. Excuse to use extreme measures to curtail protests during RNC event; 4. Scare folks and thus control them.
:puke:
They are desperate and I suspect they are capable of anything.
|
southernleftylady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. You are correct.. very desprerate n/t |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Nope. They would love to show us protesting with signs calling |
Ready4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
5. It's either real or it's a distraction. |
|
I think it's a distraction, to get people to stop talking about the Dems convention and the various great speeches.
|
Syncronaut Seven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Can you think of a better way |
|
to get the equivalent of 2 or 3 well equiped army divisions in to the city without raising eyebrows?
Take out NY & * wins the election.
|
SemperEadem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
it's being done in order to portray the RW as victims when nothing has happened.
The Dems were able to hold their convention without crying about fake terrorist attacks---they endured the slings and arrows of RW "rabid response teams" and psychotic spin from the haters without any kind of a threat of terrorism... Why is it now, all of a sudden, the refuqs are whining and crying about terror attacks? Even if it does happen, I wouldn't put it past them to have the terror crew on their payrolls to implement an attack should they not get the viewing numbers that the Dems got.
Am I really that jaded and cynical? Yup--when it comes to the RW.
|
Snoggera
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Why do the terrorists HATE NYC apparently so deeply? |
|
Wouldn't you think they would hate Washington more? Why this sick fixation on NYC? Because it ISN'T TRUE! This is another sick fairy tale from the masters of deception.
|
kittykitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
10. When it blows over, and if nothing happens, then the bushes will |
|
be able to say, "see, stick with us because we diverted these terrorists attacks on NYC and Washington".
|
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-01-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's EXACTLY what its for... to prevent protestors... I agree one MILLION |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |