DougieZero
(372 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 05:31 PM
Original message |
Forgotten Controversy: Vietnam Memorial |
|
I saw something on the History channel real quick about Veterans and people being angry at the simple black wall back when it was first being designed. They thought it was anti-war and wanted something real flashy? Also there was some problem with the young girl being Asian? I’m only 22, so I’m wondering what this was all about…
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's a beautiful memorial. I cry every time I visit there. |
|
It was controversial for the reasons that you give. The complaints about the wall led to a more traditional Vietnam statue being erected near the Wall.
The Wall is the most effective memorial I have ever seen in my life.
|
Fescue4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Although Id say the Arizona Memorial is in the same class as "effectiveness"
Both are very somber.
|
Vickers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, it was VERY controversial when the design was first presented |
|
But now Vietnam vets for the most part dig it.
Instead of celebrating war, which a lot of these things do, it remembered the troops who died. A radical idea at the time.
|
chelsea0011
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. It was a black monolith that went down into the ground |
|
The idea was that it was depressing and the fact that the woman who designed it was Asian it became a controversy.
|
MichiganVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The world renown designer is Asian |
DoBotherMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 05:50 PM by DanaM
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |