freepers once again prove "They can't read!!!!!!"

[rpannier]

I saw one of my comments made the freak republic dumbest comments. I laughed, because the person who was responding to my comment can't read. Check it out and tell me if you think they missed they point.

My Comment:
zellie miller and eddie koch

zell miller and ed koch are members of the democrats for shrubbie. my question about them, especially miller is...did the shrubbies promise them positions in his government should he be re-elected. miller is a shrub-shill. i think with koch, he got tired of being irrelevant and is trying to become someone again.
just my two cents. what do you think?
I Report, You Decide (or deride)

The Reply: (Pssttt...rpannier - Zell Miller isn't running again.)

Where in my posting does it say zell is running again?

[Daisey Mae]

1. THEY ARE JUST NUTZ .....

and not much interested in TRUTH.....

[Piperay]

2. They think they are being real clever and subtle

see you aren't suppose to go after Zig Zag cause he isn't running (but that never stops them from attacking Clinton). Repukes always throw in irrelevant crap so they can avoid answering directly.

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

3. The problem was

you used a complex sentence. They couldn't figure out who was running for re-election because you used too many words.

[Ducks In A Row]

15. The problem is he used words at all.

freepers don't really read.

oh, and bush is a coward and a liar and has killed our soliders for nothing.

[Swamp Rat]

4. Just plain dumb - lobotomy candidate.

[muchacho]

5. Readins for the Liberal Elite

Now let me gut school funding.

[RivetJoint]

6. Your sentence structure confused them

Look at the subject of your second sentence, it is Koch and Miller. And then you further single out Miller. The "he" in that sentence appears to refer to Miller, not Bush, as you intended. Therefore, the phrase "should he be re-elected" also appears to refer to Miller, not Bush. You should have said "...postitions in the Bush government should Bush be re-elected." That makes it clear as to whom's re-election you are speaking.

[acmavm]

7. I understood what he meant. It wasn't rocket science.

.

[RivetJoint]

8. So did I,

but others might not have. As evidenced by the "freeper confusion."

[Keirsey]

9. OT

Just want the freepers to see this:



caption reads: "Bush Reads Up-Side-Down?
Classic, and perfectly paradoxical photo op."

[RivetJoint]

10. LMAO

A classic!

[Elginoid]

13. to be fair, this lil' dictator photo is a bad photoshop job...

look at the picture on the back of the book in the girl's hand vs. the book in shrub's hands- the margins around the pics is completely different. also the dark spot on the book's spine- on shrub's book, the spot is on the bottom of the book(if he's really holding it upside down), on the girl's book, it's on the top. Also, the word "America" on the book's cover has too large a margin above it, as compared to the other to book covers in the pic.

[Bunny]

11. You were wrong, just admit it.

You said "...should he be re-elected." Bush was never elected, remember? That's what threw the little ignerts off!! ;)

[underseasurveyor]

12. I-i-i-it's BACONbaconbacon please give me some bacon is that it?

I CAN'T READ!

Sorry it reminded me of the doggie bacon treats commercial. Please forgive the extreme insult to dogs:spank: They are much smarter and more evolved than freeptards. Sorry Puppy Dogs :hi:
;-)

[Fleshdancer]

14. Jeez! You posted an ENTIRE paragraph! No wonder

Wittle it down in to a short sentence using small words and you'll have an easier time. :)