Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did I hallucinate this ABC story?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:02 PM
Original message
Did I hallucinate this ABC story?
I'd swear that ABC reported tonight that Bush just announced that he's cutting civil servants' pay raises to help pay for Iraq.

He can't be doing that. That would alienate a HUGE voting block. That would be stupid.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently they cut out the quote from Karl Rove:
"Voting blocks? We don't need no steenking voting blocks! That's what electronic voting machines are for!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. oops, sorry
meant to post this in GD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3.  Bush: Fedl Pay Raises Over 2% Would Jeopardize Terror War
no link yet


CRAWFORD, Texas (AP)--Giving civilian federal workers a pay raise of more than
2% next year would jeopardize the war on terrorism, President George W. Bush
said Wednesday.
In a letter to congressional leaders, Bush reiterated his support for giving
the nation's 1.8 million federal workers the 2% raise he outlined in his 2004
budget proposal.
But a House appropriations subcommittee has included a 4.1% raise in its
version of the legislation. Military pay is not affected.
"Such cost increases would threaten our efforts against terrorism or force
deep cuts in discretionary spending or federal employment to stay within
budget," Bush wrote.
Bush announced he was using his authority to change workers' pay structure in
times of "national emergency or serious economic conditions."
A national emergency has existed since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks,
and now includes Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi
Freedom, he said.




The friggin’ asshole feels it’s more worthy to spend 4 billion a month on a lie, give tax cuts to those that don’t really need it and give year-end bonuses to his inner circle….but piss on the workerbee. Compassionate Conservatism in all its glory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The emergency will be over when the last terrorist surrenders
And not a moment before.

Of course, he's right that we're in a time of "serious economic conditions," but for him to be using that to justify anything is pretty much the definition of chutzpah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Here's the DU thread for that story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah…I know…
I posted that before I saw the post from Ductape :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. "That would be stupid"
Edited on Wed Aug-27-03 07:17 PM by BeFree
Stupid is as stupid does.

I don't think he plans on finally being elected in 2004. But not to worry, his friends in the top 1% will take good care of him....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kbowe Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are the military part of that block also?
Their pay is usually tied to civil service hikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will appointees still get those bonuses?
Surely those couldn't jeopardize the war effort. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unions
Aren't most civil service jobs unionized? therefore, ergo..."who cares what they think..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Were all going to have to tighten our belts dammit

All execpt Bush's top election contributors of course. They get a huge tax cut. Nice, huh?

Don


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC