Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now We Know What Shock and Awe Was Really About

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 09:58 PM
Original message
Now We Know What Shock and Awe Was Really About
Did you hear Paul Bremmer mutter "tens of billions of dollars" today. We're talking tens of billions over and above the four billion per month spent on the military there. Now why is that?

Do people realize that when we say it will cost tens of billions to rebuild, that those tens of billions will be going in someone's pocket?

Now we know what the target of all that bombing really was. How bout the water system, the electrical system, the power system,etc.

Yessir. Gonna cost a whole lot of money to rebuild the "infrastructure".

How can people stand the stench?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course.
The dollars are gonna flow to Halliburton (as in Kellogg, Brown & Root), Bechtel and other big repuke campaign contributors. Isn't that what this whole exercise was about? Damn a few hundred getting killed. What was that old war movie called? "They Were Expendable"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, and I heard on the news today
that a branch of Haliburton got the contract to expand Guantanamo in a *non-bid* contract.

The Busheviks are like Ferdinand Marcos, convinced that the purpose of heading up a government is to make themselves and their friends even more obscenely rich than they already are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Add to that
Edited on Wed Aug-27-03 10:04 PM by ewagner
Just heard on CNN, Newsnight w/Aaron Brown, that IMF is raising eyebrows about the US deficit. Especially when it is reaching record heights without money for Iraq included . They included clips of Rummy's famous it's unknowable (how much it will cost, and Wolfowitz implying that the cost is sustainable by the Iraqi economy in a "relatively short period of time".

Note to Wolfie: Define relatively

Assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. What Gets Me Is
didn't we not too long ago watch Afghanistan bankrupt the Soviet Union? Oh, excuse me, I remember now, we convinced ourselves that it was Ronald Reagan who defeated the Soviet Union, not the tar baby that was Afghanistan.

Think about it, Afghanistan is nowhere near as developed as Iraq. If Afghanistan could bankrupt the Soviet Union with a guerilla war, what makes us think that Iraq would not bankrupt us as well? Especially since we're in a guerilla war in Afghanistan at the same time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fabius Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. How long before we have to restructure...
...to meet the IMF straightjacket? Third World here we come!

Bonus, we'll be real competitive working for $3 per day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Oh my, if the IMF were to get on our case---
and tell us to cut social services and programs (yes that's what they go around the world doing) in order to get our credit-worthiness back, a lot of countries that have suffered "IMF shock" could be forgiven for laughing.

Of course, the IMF is American (and Europeans). And so maybe this is some of the back-room-power guys throwing a hint out there--that there are limits to what they will tolerate from BushCo*. Interesting.

I like the suggestion above of just writing big checks to every Iraqi and getting out. But I have always wondered why construction has to be done by the multinational giants. Eg., why US military bases around the world had to be constructed by Bechtel. Why not contract locally? In fact, I think they do. They subcontract to get most of the work done, but are able to skim LOTS off the top. I think this is what is happening in Iraq too. There must be lots of local companies (I don't KNOW this, but it seems likely--does anyone else know?). And all their work on the pipelines and oil wells and electricity grids--I wonder what the Iraqis are being paid, and what the "managers" are being paid. And what the profit margins are. It's not as if there aren't talented, skilled Iraqis--I wonder how they feel about the capability of their new bosses.

I've wondered too about who got the contract to train the 30,000 or so new police officers. I think they're doing it in Hungary because the trainers didn't want to live in Iraq and be targets. I do know that a lot of slimy people who are closely connected to the GOP (like Wackenhut and DynCorp) have made huge fortunes in the "security" business--police, jails, intel, spies, etc. I do also wonder what new police methods they'll be teaching--hopefully not like the School of the Americas....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Here's the article
if you missed it:

IMF slams U.S. over budget


Global lending agency says government assumptions too optimistic, not doing enough to fix deficits.
August 27, 2003: 6:16 AM EDT



MILAN, Italy (Reuters) - The International Monetary Fund is set to reproach the United States for being too optimistic in its assumptions on government spending and revenues and lacking a coherent budget plan, according to a summary of a draft report.

The report "criticizes the U.S. government's excessively optimistic assumptions regarding the development of overall state spending and revenues and the lack of a medium-term concept to consolidate budgets and reform the social insurance system," the draft said.

The draft, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters, also says monetary policy-makers in industrial nations should continue to support the economic upturn.

News of the IMF report comes a day after a congressional budget agency forecast a federal budget deficit of $480 billion in 2004, a record shortfall that could pose problems for President Bush as he seeks re-election.

Bush administration officials have said that budget deficits of that size are temporary and manageable and will shrink as economic growth accelerates in the United States.


http://money.cnn.com/2003/08/27/news/economy/imf_deficit.reut/index.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Maybe to the repukes that would be a side benefit
"gee, we didn't really want to cut those social servies and programs but that mean old IMF made us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. How many billions are they talking about?
Why are we spending US tax dollars rebuilding another country. Oh yeah, cause we spent the last 12 years blowing it all up. Until GWI the Iraqi people had a resonable decent standard of living for the most part. Now we are going to spend over 2 MILLION DOLLARS PER PERSON, PER YEAR. Why don't we just write each Iraqi a check for $2,000,000 each and then get out of their country and leave them be. We will all be better off in the long run.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. sanity check
Now we are going to spend over 2 MILLION DOLLARS PER PERSON, PER YEAR.

$2.0e6 is clearly wrong. i think it's closer to $2.0e3 per person per year. still way too much.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. As someone else on DU said today,
remind Bush he said " it's your money ".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh well, we might as well do something with our surplus money
it's not like we have a crumbling infrastructure in this country.

/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. The real Shock and Awe was cost effective
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC