urbanguerrilla
(134 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 09:57 AM
Original message |
Critics go unheard on superintendents "immoral" pregnancy |
murielm99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. How dare that woman have sex? |
Infomaniac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It's a safe bet that this are Bush voters. The Herald-Journal is my hometown newspaper and is a total Repuke rag. Maybe these folks would have been happier if she stayed single and got an abortion?
|
Vogon_Glory
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
3. And The Wingnutz Want to Know What Propells The abortion Rate? |
|
Right-wing pressure groups demanding the superintendent's removal for getting pregnant? And the Holy Joes and Holy Janes want to know what keeps the abortion rate high?
Once again the radical right proves that it can't connect the dots.
Personally, I don't think that the far right will be content until the entire country is wired with a network of spy cams in everybody's bedrooms to ensure that only married heterosexual couples are allowed to have (missionary) sex.
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Oh my gosh. A well-educated, |
|
well-employed, well-paid woman has sex, gets pregnant, and gets married. So they want to fire her? Good grief.
IMO, she should tell them she got pregnant on her wedding night, had the baby 6 months early, and she is very fortunate that the baby weighed in at 9 pounds. (Whatever.) That's what they used to say years ago when the subject was too delicate to be discussed.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |