Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-10-04 10:10 AM
Original message |
The proof of an honest/stolen election sits in the optical scan ballots... |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 10:10 AM by Junkdrawer
THIS time there was a paper trail. Next time, there may not be. If they want to quiet all the "conspiracy talk", simply audit a RANDOM, statistically significant number of counties that used the optical scan ballots (and were counted with GEMS).
It's what we asked for with House Bill 2239. Without this or subsequent audits, a voter verified paper trail is meaningless.
We're waiting.......
|
PATRICK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-10-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That the idea has come this late means a probable no go from the "challenger".
Who else can use HR2239 to raise a challenge? It's probably toothless.
|
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-10-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Didn't the theft begin late in the afternoon, if yes, any random audit |
|
has to begin then. Why does if have to be random?
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-10-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. In a large state, there are thousands of precincts. A full recount... |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 10:55 AM by Junkdrawer
would take a loooong time and would be objected to on the basis of cost and making a "safe harbor" date.
But a random, statistically significant, number of precincts could be counted quickly and inexpensively. If that audit turns up problems, then a full recount would be necessary.
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-10-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |