Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suppose we could get anti-divorce amendments on the ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:46 PM
Original message
Suppose we could get anti-divorce amendments on the ballots
in the 11 states where anti-gay marriage amendments passed?

Think they'd pass? Just trying to protect the sanctity of marriage, that's all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting. Would that Mobilize our base? Could that be our wedge
issue? Or more importantly, can we get the Wingnuts to propose the same and seem Really nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea32491 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. that's excatly
what i was thinking.
My conservative friends try to tell me that banning gay marriage will help marriage, by protecting it.
what about the 60% of all married couples that get divorced each year? I think that hurts a family more than ANYTHING.
not gay marriage.
hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Our Bible Belt friends could take a cue from liberal Massachusetts,
which boasts the lowest divorce rate in the country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent Idea
I will pursue with gusto here in Mississippi. How could anyone object from the pulpit. Thanks for the idea. Wording?? Til death do you part means exactly what it says in the eyes of the lord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. To honor the holy institution of marriage by rendering divorce illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. matthew 19:6
Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (KIng James Version).

Fundies can't argue with Matthew can they?

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You should be able to get every devout Catholic to go for it, since
the Pope is against it. But most of the liberal catholics would be against it. I think this could work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Divorce is one of the things...
...that distinguishes Protestantism from Catholicsm, and any serious move to ban it would immediately be attacked on doctrinal grounds, as creeping Romanism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yet both Protestants and Catholics read the same basic Bible,
and God - or Christ, at least - frowns upon divorce in both versions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Attack it from a different angle. Try to get "Covenant Marriages" on
the ballots. These are the marriages adopted in some states where you can elect to have a higher standard to get a divorce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Then we can get even more fundies to the polls, No thanks, they
have done enough damage already. Not to mention those are a violation of the Equal Protection Clause imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Actually, when I think about it, those "covenant marriages" are
a really bad idea. They will just use them to trap women in abusive relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthALdem Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dear God, please no...
if it was there, I couldn't divorce my loser of a tard Bushie estranged husband.

But after MY divorce, I'm all for it. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. and make adultery and pre-marital sex a crime, too
those hypocritical idiots would be the first in jail.

The "protect the sanctity of marriage" thing is utter bullshit. They don't care about marriage. The highest divorce rates are in the Bush-loving states. I just moved from SW Oklahoma to N California. The divorce rate in Comanche County, Oklahoma was about 75%. And there was a really high rate of teenage pregnancy.

These people hate gays. They are driven by their hate. If they could, they would make homosexuality a crime. Actually, I am pretty sure that sooner or later they get so emboldened by Bush's "win", that they'll press for that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll support it
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
69KV Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Do some tongue in cheek amendments
Declare that marriages within fringe fundamentalist, charismatic, or evangelical sects (defined as any Christian denomination which was not recognized as mainline or mainstream in the 1950s, is involved in the "pro-life" movement, Promise Keepers or other Repuke front groups, or uses styles of worship which did not exist in the 1950s such as praise choruses and the "our god is an awesome god" schlock) will not be recognized by the state.

The amendments should also declare that modern evangelicalism is an immoral, unnatural, lifestyle choice. Nobody was *born* an evangelical. They made that choice, and in order to protect society and the sanctity of marrriage, they should not be allowed to marry.

They want to go back to the 1950s? That's exactly what we should give them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You sign up today and spam this shit all over the board!? STOP NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Anti-Divorce and Adultery
For guys adultery should lead to one year of chemical casteration, or jail time... if it was a dude.

Women are the lesser sex and should be held in a subservient position to men. Just like the bible says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think if we are going to start regulating female reprodictive organs
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 09:02 PM by quaker bill
Then a sense of equity should prevail. How about a pole tax? (Levied by the centimeter - it would help cut down on the exaggeration bit)

Perhaps an phalic operators permit? Pregnancy resulting from the unlicensed operation of your unit resulting in fines and imprisonment?

I am good with the divorce ammendment. Perhaps with forfeiture of all property and assets in the case of infidelity resulting in divorce. Prison on the second offense.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. And better yet... GET REPUBLICANS TO TAKE POSITIONS ON IT
HAHAHAHA

"I'm agin' the anti-divorce initiative beca--"
"WHY DON'T YOU RESPECT MARRIAGE! BOOOOOOOOOOO!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridadem30 Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. My sentiments exactly
I wrote a letter to the white house today that said the same thing except that I posted it based on changing laws that protect our freedoms such as Roe V. Wade and added if the president changes this law we should add some new laws about divorce and not being allowed to commit adultery either. After all marriage should be protected right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. I remember reading that in Russia, divorce was illegal
I would either be in prison now for killing my husband or dead from him killing me. I think the latter.
You have NO idea of the monster I had married. Note, we were not married long before I began to see the light.
He would rent Grade B slasher films and replay the scenes over and over of the woman getting murdered although it sounded like she was having an orgasm. I heard this from upstairs so he was not doing it for MY benefit. Whenever I hear of a serial killer in his area, I put on my alert and check it out to see if it is him.
You can call me happily divorced, but I was lucky to get out with my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. We wouldn't push these amendments thinking they'd pass.
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 10:50 PM by elperromagico
They wouldn't pass. The point would be to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the people who pushed the gay marriage amendments. Those amendments weren't designed to sanctify marriage. They were designed to help Bush.

Glad you got out of that marriage. Nobody needs to be married to a nutcase. Ask Laura. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. As I said in an earlier reply, you don't put these amendments up
thinking they'll pass. None of us want divorce to be illegal. People make wrong choices and need to get out of bad marriages.

It's like Bush's move for a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. He knew it wouldn't pass. But it was tossing a bone to his base.

Any amendments regarding marriage that made it onto the ballots would be merely symbolic in nature. It's all about pointing up hypocrisy. Oh... and protecting marriage. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC