Washington Post article on "conspiracy theory." If they'd treated Watergate

[Cyrano]

this way, Nixon would still be president (dead or not).

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41106-2004Nov10.html?referrer%3Demail&sub=AR

Reading this piece of garbage, I got the feeling that the Washington Post is now on Karl Rove's payroll. Katherine Graham must be rolling over in her grave and Ben Bradley is probably wishing he'd fired Bob Woodward before he got to be a senior editor.

I believe that during Watergate, The Washington Post and The New York Times were two of the biggest factors that helped save democracy. Today, they might as well be west wing employees.

[Kolesar]

1. that link won't execute for me ... eom

[Cyrano]

2. Damn. I'm registered with the WaPo and that's why it's pulling up for me.

Basically, they've found a way to discount and explain away virtually every discrepancy Bev Harris and others have come up with. Their story is trying to make the case that the election wasn't stolen.

Tomorrow, they'll probably do pieces on how Caligula and Hitler were just misunderstood guys.

[Benhurst]

3. I agree. Both papers are major mediawhores. And

the article to which you refer is an attempt to cover-up the theft, once again, of the White House by the Bush Crime Family.