Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush spent 70 minutes talking with the Plame prosecutor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nixonwasbetterthanW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:28 PM
Original message
Bush spent 70 minutes talking with the Plame prosecutor.


That information was reported in June. It's now five months later.

If Bush knew nothing, then the conversation with Fitzgerald would have ended about 69 minutes sooner. The answers had to be either "yes," "no," "I don't recall" or "Fifth Amendment."

Those of you who work in the legal system -- doesn't 70 minutes indicate that Fitzgerald was hunting for significant information from the president himself?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not neccessarily.
Depositions are, by their very nature, long and detailed. That he spent X amount of time talking with Mr. Fitzgerald is, in and of itself, meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't think it was characterized as a "deposition"
Just an interview. And I recall that the length of that interview was MOST significant to Marshall and Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I didn't see anything that made it clear...
It was unclear whether he was sworn, or not; in any event, the length isn't terribly significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not really
Fitzgerald would have been wise to ask questions of the who, what, when, where and why questions. For example, Fitzgerald would be interested in finding out when Bush found out about Plame, what were the circumstances, why did he know, etc. etc. The best questions would be those that would elict a response more than just "yes" or "no."

As to Bush's answers they are probably dependent on what Rove told him to remember and what details to go into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was the thought here at the time...
And on other sites as well. I specifically recall Josh Marshall and John Dean saying what you're saying.

Remember the young prosecutor in the movie "Z"? He brought the Generals down with his investigation. That's the one post-election fantasy I'm still clinging to... that Fitzgerald will do the same.

(I still suspect Asscrack's resignation was because he's the one that gave Plame's nmae to Libby... and indictments are near.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe he asked under oath
"did you have sex with anyone other than your wife"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. 70 minutes= A handshake, a slap on the back and six gin & tonics
I'll bet they chortled over how they were pulling the wool over the country's eyes.

This little meeting was the one where Bush promised Fitzgerald the appointment of his choice... as long as he pushed the Plame investigation off until sometime after November 2nd.

Mission accomplished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC