proud_Kucitizen
(191 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-18-04 11:19 PM
Original message |
|
Buchanan was sitting in for Scarborough and they were talking about the liberal bias of the New York times. One of the guests not sure what his name was said something to the effect I don't see how you can say they are biased when the only one who has even reported about the problems in this election has been Keith Olbermann and the rest of the media including the New York times has kept amazingly silent about this whole issue. I have never seen Buchanan so speechless, there was actually a few seconds of silence after he said that.
|
Shopaholic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-18-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Damn, sorry I missed that! |
tk2kewl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-18-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
drunkdriver-in-chief
(267 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-18-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The press created the liberal bias myth about themselves |
|
The press is overwhelmingly pro-gop and has been for 25 years and the press knows it - so they say just the opposite in the hopes we won't catch on.
|
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-18-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I shut it off too soon |
|
I was too disgusted to watch after Buchanan had the nerve to whine about how he felt the NYT used their position as a media source to try to influence their audience before the election.
What can you even say to something like that?
|
PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Gee and MSGOP didn't try to cover for Bush?!? |
|
:wtf:
Buchannan can go "F" himself!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |