Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Obama really a liberal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:10 PM
Original message
Is Obama really a liberal?
I really don't know much about Barrack Obama. Is he really a liberal in the Boxer, Wellstone, Feingold, Kennedy tradition, or is he a moderate that liberals are giving undue praise like Hillary Clinton? Where does he stand on Welfare, gay rights, healthcare, civil liberties, taxes, war and peace ect ect? How did he vote in the Illinois legislature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I read some where that he's against gay marriage.
So if that's true, then he sure as hell isn't a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not many "liberals" at all by that standard.
Not Clinton, Gore, or Kerry.

And not the vast bulk of the populace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Liberals aren't bigots.
If you're against gay marriage, you're a bigot. No ifs and or buts. Doesn't matter who you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Had a hard time supporting Kerry, eh?
You wouldn't vote for a "bigot" would you?

So do we have you to blame for the loss? What state are you in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Yes..DrWeird is the reason we lost
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thank goodness!
I was having trouble coping with the whole thing...


But now that I have someone to BLAME I feel much better.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Or you can be like a lot of other dems
and just blame the gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Yeah! They're either liars or unpatriotic. Right?
Exit polling showed 4% of the electorate considered themselves gay/lesbian.

So that means that only a quarter of them showed up to vote in our largest turnout election in decades?

What... the issues weren't important enough for them?

< /tongue in cheek>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. You can be a liberal and a bigot.
I'm intolerant toward Christian fundamentalists. I still consider myself liberal. As for gay marriage, many people look at it in a religious context rather than as a matter of equal rights. The question is how to get people to see it as a matter of fairness and separate from their religious views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Clinton and Gore aren't liberals
some say Kerry is, but i don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thurston Howell IV Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I heard him speak at length on this in a radio interview
It was before the Newson/SF Gay marriage media fest. He essentially played the very smart politician on this one. He said that he felt that there was not a consensus in the gay community on whether to push for gay marriage at this time. Does the gay community feel that it should expend its "political capital" (my interpretation of his statement) on this issue at this time? His position was that he was waiting to see where they wanted to go, and it sounded like he would lend his support once a consensus developed.

I take this to be a politically "rational" position. But I certainly sensed that he is in favor of equal rights. The question is how/when to pursue the particulars. As we can see, the push for gay marriage at this time may have backfired in the short-term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NervousRex Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Time will tell...
but I have my suspicions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well
I am a gay Democrat and Boxer, Feingold, AND Wellstone were all opposed to gay marriage. While I am extremely dissapointed in them and wa sin Wellstone I still consider them liberals. they do support civil unions. I think only Kennedy supports gay marriage. No other senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. He got star status very quickly.
Speaking for myself I'll wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Any particular issues you're interested in?
http://www.obamablog.com/

I believe the man is honest and his political persuasion is obvious to anyone who considers his record objectively....

Just my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitka Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I agree. Look at the man's record. That will answer your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Her Blondness Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. And is he really black?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did you see him on Letterman?
Yes, he's eloquent and telegenic. But he had nothing nice to say about Kerry, and when Letterman asked about the race, he said "mistakes were made" and praised bushes campaign. Letterman asked him to name an example of a "mistake" and he said "windsurfing."

Gotta say, I lost some enthusiam for Obama with those remarks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I posted a thread saying that and argued for days. I was informed NO ONE
saw Obama's statement like that and I must have been watching another show in my head. Thank you for posting this. Now I have proof I am not alone! I lost ALOT of enthusiasm for Obama with those remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. he meant that the windsurfing thing played into the 'elitist' label Kerry
was given. don't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just because he might not be a liberal doesn't mean praise is undue.
Even if Obama is a mainstream Democrat or a centrist, he gets major kudoes for the sentiment expressed in his convention speech, which is that the whole red-state/blue-state paradigm is divisive and full of crap. This guy is the real thing when it comes to uniting, not dividing. The guy's potential for leadership, IMO, outweighs his stance on any particular issue as long as he's not a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obviousman Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. For goodness sake, we have to stop eating our own
Obama will be a great senator, but just because he does not embrace every ideal you have doesnt mean we should turn the firing squad on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. since he has yet to serve a single day
as a seated US Senator....

it's kind of hard to tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NervousRex Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Agreed
I will wait a few years before I hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guarionex Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't like Obama
Something about him don't jive well with me...can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's his perfect "race-uniter" status...he got famous too quick...and his message is not one of fighting for our rights, but rather more of the wishy washy "hope" talk that we get from left Democrats..

I want leaders that will talk clearly...and fight the Fascist juggernaut.

My support for the Democratic Party was conditional this election cycle...conditional on removing the fascist, Bush. But, now that this is not a consideration, I will examine more radical parties for support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No one gets a break here
Give the guy a chance. He's just getting started at the national level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well he's my senator and I wish people who don't live in Illinois
would get their own PAIR of Democratic senators and stop expecting our freshman senator from Illinois to save them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. THANK YOU!
WTF do people insist on putting the kid (in political terms, he is) on a pedestal and knocking him off it again 40 times before his first day in the Senate?

He's not going to save the Party heroically or betray it to its doom any time soon. He's going to be doing a whole lot of unglamorous grunt work, and maybe...maybe...get the chance to make a few speeches once in a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitka Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. That's ridiculous.
Obama is so much a progressive that there was no way I thought we had a chance of actually winning the primary in IL. You'd give condititonal support to a Dem like Kerry but not Obama? I think you should look at his record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Your low post count doesn't help your case...
But I I won't yell troll just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Dupe (n/t)
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 11:17 PM by Hippo_Tron
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. Something about Obama doesn't jibe well with me, either,
and I can't put my finger on it.

I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but I've had the same feelings about others whom everyone loved, but my doubts turned out to be accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I can't say that I don't like him but
it was obvious the Wrongs threw the IL election. From the go I've felt he was being set up for something whether of his own accord or not I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Threw it?
Nah. They're just FUBAR in Illinois. Corruption scandals, mostly--years and years of them. Not to mention that George Ryan's last stand (moratorium on the death penalty and then mass commutation of sentences) was actually pretty damn amazing to progressive eyes, and demoralized the RW something fierce.

Obama wasn't even originally the frontrunner in the Dem primary. That was Blair Hull, who got taken out by allegations of domestic violence against his former wife.

So then as the race proper starts up, he's against Jack Ryan, kind of your typical Republican stiffy, but kind of handsome and with some claim to "compassionate conservatism." Would have been closer, anyway--but then Ryan's divorce records came out, and it turned out he'd tried to pressure his wife Jeri Ryan (Seven of Nine on Star Trek Voyager, BTW...you can't make this stuff up!) into believing that "public service" was something you did in adults-only clubs. Even before this point, though, Obama was opening up a lead.

Now, because the Republicans in Illinois are in such disarray--and such a state of war between the old-guard moderates and the foaming freepers, they were having trouble finding someone who wants the job, much less can win. I still don't know how they hell they came up with Keyes, but I know the old guard was NOT happy.

Why is Obama such a media/party darling? I think it's many reasons (not necessary in order of importance, but maybe):

1. He's extremely intelligent and eloquent. First Black Pres of Harvard Law Review ain't shabby.
2. He's a very, very attractive man. (Yes, this does matter! More than it should.)
3. Really interesting background. Immediate family on three continents, and he's even part white/Red State (Kansas, specifically, though he grew up in Hawaii).
4. Nationally speaking, Illinois is blue to the bone (for much the same reason New York State is--it's got that 800-lb. urban gorilla in the corner). Unless he gets caught molesting a Doberman, Obama's probably in as long as he wants to stay. But it's also genuinely midwestern, so it improves that Heartland cred.

So no, I think it's not some kind of conspiracy, just a dramatic convergence of X factors, a sort of Perfect Storm of Senate races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. We will just have to sit and wait...
...to find out. Won't we? We need to judge him for his actions as Senator. Only time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlFrankenFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. gawd didn't you guys want him in 2012 just a few months ago?!
do your research first....:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. We need MORE Obamas, especially in Louisiana

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doomsayer13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. He had a solid liberal record in the State Senate
but he was also popular with his Republican colleaugues becuase he was a consensus builder and worked for practical problem solving in government. He's well spoken, articulate, and a proven winner. Those three considered, I predict that he'll be unpopular at DU in about a year.

DU has proven time and time again that they respect losers more than winners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
39. Here's his page at issues2000.org
http://www.issues2000.org/Senate/Barack_Obama.htm

FWIW, he's rated as slightly more liberal than Hillary on their graph thingy, both socially and economically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
40. Fairly sure he is, though the DLC tried to claim him as their own.
He put a stop to THAT bit of body-snatching, though, and none too soon!

I'll be watching the guy. He seems promising.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC