Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP ed.: Homeland Security employees "gagged," subject to searches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:21 AM
Original message
WP ed.: Homeland Security employees "gagged," subject to searches
Homeland Secrecy
Friday, December 3, 2004; Page A26


THE GOVERNMENT keeps too many secrets. It classifies information that would do no harm if published; this impedes information-sharing within the government and erodes public confidence. Now the Department of Homeland Security is adding a new twist: aggressive secrecy concerning information that isn't even classified.

In recent months, the department has been requiring new employees and contractors to sign non-disclosure agreements regarding "sensitive but unclassified" information they learn at work. Signers must acknowledge that they "could be subject to administrative, disciplinary, civil or criminal action" for violations and that the government may "conduct inspections, at any time or place, for the purpose of ensuring compliance." In other words, as a condition of their employment, DHS workers have to accept a gag agreement and permit potentially intrusive searches as well.

Labor unions have understandably complained, and a DHS official says the agreements are being reviewed. This official explains that the agreements merely duplicate regulations that already protect certain categories of information; they don't actually do much at all, he says, and may therefore not be necessary. It's true they're not necessary, but anti-secrecy activist Steven Aftergood disputes the contention that they would have little effect. He says they could chill whistle-blowing and more basic discussion between government employees and the outside world. Mr. Aftergood notes that the military doesn't require its employees to sign such documents. DHS shouldn't either....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30124-2004Dec2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. it is getting real scary to live in America!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. More and more so. I keep wondering when some
foreign country will come to our rescue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. DHS personnel don't even know this yet..........
There are, however, other changes that they DO know about:

Homeland Security's Personnel Rules Overhaul Will Proceed Without
Ridge

By Stephen Barr

The departure of Tom Ridge as secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security will not slow plans to overhaul rules for
how thousands of Homeland Security employees are paid, promoted
and disciplined, a top official said yesterday.

"We are continuing on the path of establishing the new HR
system," said Janet Hale, the department's
undersecretary for management. "The department needs the new HR
system, and we need to act quickly and decisively to meet our
mission needs. We know that it is a priority of his to complete
before his departure."

Ridge said on Tuesday that he would leave the department by Feb. 1.
That deadline suggests that the department will try to publish its
final rules in January. The rule changes were authorized by
Congress two years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC