Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why isn't it scandalous that over 1/2 of Bush's cabinet has resigned...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:38 PM
Original message
Why isn't it scandalous that over 1/2 of Bush's cabinet has resigned...
8 so far this year, IIRC... and something like 10-12 total over the last 4 years.

Is this SOP after re-election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait until you hear what is next
Rumor has it that Jenna and Barbara will be the next to resign. They are considering hiring Mary Kate and Ashley Olson to replace the twins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The real question you want to ask is...
Why isn't it scandalous that they were all there in the first place?

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Wouldnt Mary Kate and Ashley

account for only 1.5 daughters rather than the full complement of 2 required for a full replacement ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is no big deal, massive cabinet changes are a fairly regular thing
Hell, Nixon's entire cabinet changed over at the beginning of his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. i wonder why!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBiker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. To produce a deep bench for the future...
This is Mr.Blank Former secretary of whatever...When future Admins are in power, a good start up team is available...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Some of then truly get burned out. Other take the 4 years
they were in the cabinet and parlay it into high paying jobs in the pprivate sector(ala Dick Cheney), start their own political careers, or join think tanks as consultants for big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. not really. new terms always have resignations
it would be better if bush resigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. i think
it is pro forma that the entire cabinet submits a letter of resignation to the president at the end of a first term...
sort of to free up the president from having to fire anyone.

it does look like rats abandoning a sinking ship... in an ocean full of sharks

whalerider55
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've got a better one
Why is Israel's plan for Gaza referred to as a "re-deployment" instead of the "pullback" or "withdrawal" that it really is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. Relevant to this discussion in what possible way?
Really.

Please answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think after Clinton's reelection 8 resigned, and 9 did under Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They keep getting replaced with worse peole
What's the Fourth Reich without Himmler, Goebbels, Hess, and Goerings equivelents? Bushes old cabinet was mostly evil, they need REALLY EVIL to pull of the world extermination plan for everyone but Christian Fundamentalists.

And let's not forget why the nazis lost - the US got the bomb first. This time, Hitler is already holding the bomb. Gotta get in poeple willing to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. not at all; what is really scandolous is that the other half didn't
resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why isn't it scandalous that Rummy was aksed to stay?
That is the real question. Just wait folks, all hell is going to break out after January 22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nascarblue Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Rummy is the one of the men behind the curtain.
Rummy, Wolf, and Rove aren't going anywhere. Come to think of it, that goes for the reunification of post WW2 Germany scholar, Condi Rice as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Follow along with the Bush cabinet playing card set
featuring all of our favorite players pictured on the face of one of the playing cards. Tom Ridge was the Jack of clubs. Spence Abraham, the four of spades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not a scandal, just typical if a president
has a second term. It was much more usual in the past for cabinet members to serve a couple of years and move on.

These are all people who could make scads more money in the private sector, so what's amazing to me is that they all stayed the entire four years. Amazing that greed didn't win out, and amazing and sad that they've all stayed so long in the service of such evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Maybe they were all promised jobs with Carlyle after 2008

if they stayed on as long as W{idowmaker) wanted them to. What do we know about what really goes on, what promises and deals are made in the upper echelons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. I just want to be at the White House in January
To egg his car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Frankly it's hard for me to get overly concerned

with one set of political hacks replacing another.

Same old incompetence and corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoMomma456 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. No... normal amount.
Nixon had 11, I read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's scandalous to me
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. 2nd Term Resignations
This really isn't anything new. There usually is a high turnover in a 2nd term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSAtheist Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes...
Sometimes they don't even last that long. Carter asked his whole cabinet to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC