Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey, weren't steroids ok when Arnie used them?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:21 AM
Original message
Hey, weren't steroids ok when Arnie used them?
Am I wrong on this? I thought all super athletes used steroids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. At least he can't reproduce
There's at least one positive aspect to his steroids - Arnold apparently can't reproduce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vpigrad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who says they're wrong now?
Why can't I take what I want when I want?

I take this issue seriously since I need testosterone supplementation, and I don't have the ~$5k required to bribe someone in the medical cartel to be allowed to buy and use it. Also, in my research I found that I could buy 10 grams of testosterone for $80 from my local feed store, but the same thing costs over $2,000 at Walgreens. A neighbor has bought it from the feed store and spent about $5/gram to convert it to an injectible for over 10 years without problem. It's ridiculous what the drug companies get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. i'm OK with them
I'm not sure why they are being demonized. Some say it is unfair. Why is it unfair that someone who was born with a better genetic heritage can have the capacity to earn tens of millions of dollars? That is not through any great strength of character or determination that a person was born with a better body. They got it in their DNA.

Steroids don't "make" a person win. Just as with the person of superior genetic heritage, you still have to do all the work and all the training. Steroids don't do it for you, any more than DNA does.

I don't see anything morally wrong with someone wanting to do whatever is necessary to bring their performance to the level they desire. Maybe it is legally wrong, but that is pretty arbitrary.

People who think steroids give an unfair advantage should take some and then see how they suddenly become a pro athlete and win zillions of dollars. Yeah, right. If it was that easy, we'd all do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. and coke was ok for bush
depends on who you are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC